Axis & Allies
Flirting With War on the Path to Peace
Author’s Note: If you get anything out of this writing and appreciate the time and effort it takes to put it all together while juggling a day job with a glorious—and gloriously chaotic—infant, do consider supporting the work I do in the form of Paid Subscriptions to this publication (cancel at anytime,) or one-time Coffee Donations.
Your support makes it all possible.
Back on June 17, I BELIEVE I caught a glimpse of where the Story of the Peacemakers was headed—something I have been projecting since 2022 in these digital pages—and cautioned that the tension would reach new heights, ironically on the back of bright bits of comedy leading the way.
As I said then:
“Keep in mind that, in the midst of the very serious build-up to the very real threat of the very real war that has been promised for generations, two of the men ostensibly destined to fight on opposite sides of it are having friendly birthday calls in the interim.
Plain sight.”
Which was in response to what I saw as a strange convergence between the Israel-Iran Crisis (Story,) and the Russian and Chinese theaters of the Info War, all coming through friendly birthday phone calls between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
As I said in the above clip:
“These are the hints Trump gives you … when you see the headlines about WW3 coming with Russia, please try to remember Trump’s birthday posts with Putin and how much they flirt with each other, or … last week, when he said (with Xi,) we’re gonna be best friends forever. He’s kind of just telling you.”
Those are the fun bits from a memetic standpoint—the thematic, winking anchors that represent Trump speaking to multiple audiences at once about the war beneath the war, and the deals beneath the deals—but that’s not where we stop around here.
So, how has the Story of the Peacemakers been progressing, regressing and then progressing of late?
A story that looks an AWFUL lot like the story of an impending world war, and one that I have been arguing staunchly, albeit admittedly unknowingly, will never arrive?
Was I right to project that the seeming smooth sailing being communicated through perfect (birthday-themed) phone calls between the Sovereign Bros was a signal flare of calm ahead of the engineered turbulence of a series of storms we weren’t just warned of, but in a way, promised?
To answer that, I’ll present a story—one of MANY from the week that was—in the form of headlines, and let you do the mental math from there:
So, did you fall for the latest in the oldest game of Kayfabe going in the Info War? The original, some might say?
Did you ignore the signal inherent in the Sovereign Bros. Birthday call, and fall prey to the Marauding Medvedev and the Trumpian Turret, as we discussed last week?
As discussed in the unfortunately, but undoubtedly very cleverly named piece linked above, I explored Medvedev vs. Trump and the renewal of some soft (for now) Trump vs. Putin drama as a way for both to effect a narrative pincer around the nuclear narrative, which they are disarming while using the energy of said disarmament to supercharge the re-nuclearization narrative, both gaining narrative shielding for the effort around the full public mandate for each.
That's a lot of narrative, I admit, but as we’ve seen, Trump and Putin reportedly had a phone call (perhaps another perfect one?) AFTER the rhetorical dust up with Medvedev, in which they apparently reiterated positions they’ve been stating over and over publicly and with great clarity since Russia’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine first kicked off.
Following this consistent bit of Info War normalcy, we are then told—by the Ukrainians, of course—that the Russians have attacked … AGAIN! Only … more this time! Or something.
And then we’re told—also by the Ukrainians, of course, but then also sort of by the administration, albeit haltingly—that the US is first halting additional arms to Ukraine.
To the Ukrainian side--and to many in the normie layers of the Info War--this sequence of events is full of contradictions.
To me, it's full of confirmations.
Confirmation that Trump and Putin are fighting a different sort of war ... against a different sort of enemy, all the while navigating a mass psychological battlespace that has been programmed largely through total inversion.
And before the dust has even settled on the latest mix of PsyOps and PsyActs to spill out of the lands that peace forgot—and which I also wrote about extensively throughout the narrative—Trump is using its aftermath to set signal as to the larger war … the narrative one, if you’re paying attention.
From Breitbart:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth championed the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites via Operation Midnight Hammer, making it clear that American leadership and deterrence were reestablished.
“What was demonstrated on the world stage was American military might and capability,” he said.
“And our so-called enemies were watching,” Trump emphasized. “They watched every minute of it. They watched. There were very few people that weren’t watching, actually, but they watched every minute. It was a perfect military performance, the likes of which we haven’t seen in a long time.”
A “perfect military performance,” you say?
“So-called enemies,” you intone?
Guys. It honestly doesn’t get much more on the nose than this, as I’ve been arguing that we’re in the midst of a slow, steady—and then quite sudden—inversion of the Axis and Allies paradigm we’ve been programed with since the close of World War 2, and which the original draft of World War 3 was meant to feature prominently once more, albeit with fresh coats of their respective East-West paint applied.
But then, it seems that script didn’t just get rejected, but trimmed, edited, re-written and ultimately transformed into the narrative inversion we’ve been tracking since the enemy first attempted—somewhat successfully, I might add, and to their own detriment—to conflate Trump and Putin in the Collective Mind.
Which, as I have been arguing for a LONG time, should lend credence to the idea that the back-and-forth, engineered whiplash that often follows Trumpian deployments is a feature, and not a bug of the engineered chaos of the Info War.
To wit ... what's that, the weapons shipments are back on?
From ZeroHedge:
"They have to be able to defend themselves," Trump said Monday, offering confirmation of his weapons to Ukraine policy U-turn. "They're getting hit very hard. ... We're gonna have to send more weapons."
A presidential aide to Volodymyr Zelensky has offered new insight into how Trump's reversal came about, especially related to his phone call with the Ukrainian president held last Friday, after a prior 'disappointing' Putin call.
Yermak described that Trump's decision to reverse course on the pause in weaponry was "very well received in Ukraine, especially after very substantial phone conversation" on Friday. He added in a NY Post interview that the US President clearly remains "fully supportive of continuation of the aid to Ukraine."
And of COURSE it was all coordinated through a series of perfect phone calls that just keep on changing every character's mind (for better or worse) so that the story can move on to its next chapter ... err, re-run.
Which, in turn means the war (that hasn't ended) is still not ended EVEN HARDER!
And you absolutely MUST believe it, by the way … as the header was accompanied by this rather convincing, albeit incredibly vague file image from the State Emergency Service of Ukraine depicting general, all around bad stuff happening.
But then, don’t fret, if you’re still taking everything Narrative as Actual … as Putin doesn't seem closed off to peace. Just ... not yet.
All sides in the know KNOW the string has not been fully played out yet, as the global (not the globalIST) appetite for war wanes in direct proportion to how high its appetite for peace is wetted.
... and confirmation that when both say the deals will be done on a certain timeline, they know exactly what that timeline is, even if it's not entirely temporal, but more causal ... sequential.
Returning to the previous article:
"He was quite disturbed by recent strikes — they've been happening for more than three years — but by recent strikes, murders with drones and missiles that fall in Ukrainian cities, including the capital of Ukraine," Yermak told the Post. "Absolutely, [Trump and Zelenskyy] are united in this. These two leaders definitely want peace, and they are absolutely against the killing."
Sometimes, they put the signal out on purpose, and sometimes, they put it out quite by accident.
To wit, if the Our Boy Z template is accurate on the macro, then so is the above statement; after all, as I have argued for three years, it takes two to make a perfect phone call ... but it takes three to broker a deal.
And I believe the TRUE enemy (the invisible one, and the one who formerly controlled Zelenskyy) knows this, too, which is why they're beginning to tell the Collective Mind what they truly fear: not Russia alone ... and not Putin. But Putin AND Trump, which is a narrative that is as cognitive dissonance-inducing to the normie layers as it is steadying to us.
So ... what is the Sovereign Alliance fighting against?
The oldest enemy.
The invisible enemy.
The one that convinced you it no longer existed.
But, before we get to that (and not for the first time in these digital pages,) it's worth taking a look at some of the more curious narrative deployments from this particular theater—the first one I began writing about in the Info War—that flew under the radar in the midst of the 12-day (Narrative) War against War itself, and that seems to be getting similarly lost in the flood of a resurgence in the Epstein of it all, for better or worse.
(Don’t worry. We’re going to discuss that particular theater in depth next time, but I think it will behoove all of us to allow for some settling … and some needed sifting before we do.)
And again, I’ll present this particular bit of strangeness in headlines, as I think patterning the piece this way might help to clue you in to how I tend to look for patterns in the War of Stories.
It’s not one headline alone. It’s how they alternatively converge or invert one another, often telling a story in the process, whether they wish to or not.
When it comes to the first two headlines, convergence is the name of the game, and I often say that the end stage of what I have dubbed Overton's Goalpost is enemy convergence with the truth ... or else, de facto ceding of mass psychological ground TO it.
So, what is the referenced, but not explicitly stated truth in the Zelenskyy seed, the Steve Witkoff (ie: Trump) germination and the Kremlin harvest?
That ALL of the stories OF the wars we’re being told from 2022 through 2025 are part of the same macro War of Stories, with Ghosts of the Sovereign Alliance doing their damndest to seed that reality into the Collective Mind on a subconscious level so that they might better recognize the invisible enemy, which I wrote about at length in a recent long-form that drew a lot of nice feedback from you folks.
The Invisible Enemy
So, how do we sum up the events of the last few weeks in an uncommonly—for me—succinct manner, before getting to the fun stuff?
With regards to the third headline, then, we seem to have Vladimir Putin not just making one of the most interesting observations about Israel we've seen in some time—and there have been a LOT of interesting observations about Israel—but heavily seeding fifth-gen warfare terminology into that very deployment.
From RT:
Putin dismissed criticism that Russia should have done more to support Iran.
“Start some kind of combat operations, is that it?” he asked.
“We already have combat operations going on against those who we consider opponents of the ideas we defend and who pose a threat to the Russian Federation,” he said, adding that these opponents are “far behind the frontline” and are “basically the same forces – with Iran and in the case of Russia.”
According to the Kremlin, Putin has a “complete picture” of the situation, as one of the few leaders to speak directly with the heads of Israel, Iran, and the US since the conflict flared up last week.
Well damn.
Donnie might have dropped comms about ‘military performances’ and ‘so-called enemies,’ but Uncle Vlad seems to consider the western persuasion of the War of Stories to be a bit slow on the uptake for his liking.
To wit, while Zelenskyy was the first of the three characters on display in this particular theater to draw a direct comparison between the threat Iran poses and the one Russia does, de facto conflating the plight of Ukraine and Israel ... and while the US (through Trump's narrative 'envoy') followed suit a short while later, Putin SEEMS to be the outlier.
Russia instead condemned comparisons between the two wars, and their stories ... and yet, in their own way, conflated Israel and Ukraine when it comes to commentary on who 'started' it.
To wit, the brightest signal in a maze of competing and converging deployments might just be Zelenskyy worrying over warm rhetoric between the two, retroactive codification that the newest round of kayfabe wasn't just expected, but telegraphed with a friendly birthday call, while our favorite Prussian Proxy Prince lends consistent narrative assists.
Observe … a recent Ukrainian disclosure masquerading as the latest in a long line of drama-filled crash-outs:
But it didn’t stop there.
Our Boy Z told us, my friends.
He not only told us once again that only Trump can ‘stop’ Putin, which is literally AND bicamerally true, whether you’re speaking from the perspective of a central narrative believer, or a based and red-pilled Sovereign Alliance stalwart. Hell, I’ve been saying as much since my very first feature after founding this publication.
But then, Zelenskyy didn’t just remind us of the Macro in his June 14 tantrum. He also pre-empted the same micro I’ve also been projecting for years—that being the inevitable and somewhat regrettable, albeit entertaining escalation between the Peacemakers before a gradual and then quite sudden and sharp pivot toward the war’s—which is to say, the story’s—true ending.
“A change in tone is required.”
On that, we can agree, Z.
Choice to know, and all that.
And that tonal shift can sometimes be more subtle, such as the narrative pivot from nuclear weaponry to nuclear energy, which I wrote about two weeks ago … again, spearheaded by the Russians:
Did you catch it?
The language shift?
The softening?
Now the Russians are talking about Nuclear Energy ... not Nuclear Weaponry.
More to the point, they're talking treaties and agreements, taking a page out of Trump's book—the one he’s currently employing against the Federal Reserve and the Global Fiat Central Banking System, as we’ve explored at length in ‘Reality Wars’ and the new ‘Acceleratia’ series—by using the enemy's systemic arguments against them.
The strangely, almost disturbingly logical and consistent stance of the former Soviets with regards to Iran’s so-called ‘nuclear sovereignty’ recalls the anchoring tactic Trump not only made famous in the 1980s, but that has re-entered the geopolitical zeitgeist, expanding from its former use and ubiquity on Wall Street to its current deployment from Brussels to Tel Aviv.
By anchoring to the core tenet of sovereignty, and carrying the mass psychological and geopolitical weight it does, Russia is forcing the turning of the page on the Iran Nuclear Narrative, transitioning from fear-mongering, warmongering and abject panic—not to mention Trump’s corresponding fire and brimstone—to something that looks an awful lot like common sense.
All giving Trump the Narrative Shielding to follow suit … in due course.
This anchoring tactic is something even the Normie Layers of the Collective Mind were educated on during Trump’s April Tariff Tantrum, which, predictably resulted in the entirety of the media apparatus and any normies who still engage there to go all-in AGAINST the tactic … only for the latest economic data to prove it not just effective, but demonstrably and inarguably so.
But then … you didn’t think I was going to leave Our Boy Z out of this particular theater, did you?
Because he had something to say quite recently that maps onto the above, and then some.
From The Libertarian Institute:
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed that he was told by the US not to attack Russian energy infrastructure shortly after Vladimir Putin spoke with President Donald Trump.
"Today, the Russians launched a stone-cold, combined attack on our energy infrastructure. This is a spit in the face of everything the international community is trying to do to stop this war," the Ukrainian leader said Sunday. "It happened right after Putin’s conversation with Trump. After the Americans asked us not to strike Russian energy facilities."
And that’s not where the Ukrainian dwarf king’s complaints ended, as, in between the latest bravado, bluster and Trumpian ‘disappointment,’ the reported actuals out of the Trump Administration toward Russia from a policy perspective continue to boggle the collectivist mind … but not yours, I hope.
And Trump isn’t the only one pushing forward de-escalation actuals in the midst of escalatory narratives.
To wit, listen to how Putin talks about him in the following clip, posted in late June.
“I deeply respect Trump. He's a courageous man who survived two assassination attempts. I believe he truly wants peace in Ukraine and the Middle East, though it may be harder than he expected.”
Just like Trump, Putin is all signal, all the time … even if that signal is sometimes harder than we expected to parse.
But then, isn’t that the fun part?
As long as we’re focused on the endgame, which we were told by BOTH men at the beginning—PEACE, de-nazification, denuclearization (from a kinetic standpoint,) and restoration—the plot twists and turns in the interim don’t just become easier to weather, but to track, and to understand on a tactical and strategic level, akin to how seeing the subject on its sun-drenched pedestal illuminates not just the work to come, but the method behind the artist’s—the master’s—otherwise random-seeming brush strokes on the way to capturing its essence, immortalizing its likeness and translating its being—its truth—across space and time.
But then, I am prone to waxing poetic from time to time, as you know.
So, where is it all going?
The convergence of the Sovereign Alliance in the Collective Mind and in the central narrative is going to be preceded (or pre-seeded, in this context) via the continued exposure of the Invisible Enemy, and that seems to be occuring most consistently through the cascade of proxy wars forwarding the dissolution of proxy states.
Mileage certainly varies on whether to define Israel or Iran under this context, but from where I'm sitting, the Invisible Enemy has wielded both in the longest-running and arguably most effective Forever War template and all its various proxies we've yet witnessed.
What Trump has achieved in short order is less an actual disarmament and more a narrative one, which, for it to hold, suggests the Regime has been removed from its position in Iran (lack of retaliation and willingness to come to the table,) and Israel, with the Our Boy Yoo-hoo refrain (h/t
,) and the Israeli war hawks positioning themselves to get him out.Ukraine, then stands as the most effective Proxy State Exposure op we've seen, with the war itself growing increasingly untenable not just on an actual level, but more so on a narrative one, as the Collective Western Mind has grown as weary as they have wary not just of Ukraine's prospects of winning the war ... but more so, of what the continuation of the fight itself might mean for them, given the primal fear narrative the Regime has saddled the US-Russia pincer with, and that I have spent a good deal of my writing in these digital pages documenting since 2022.
But there is another proxy on the game board, one whose recognition has expanded by orders of magnitude since the Covid crisis—engineered as it was—exposed just how dependent the US and the western hegemon is on the technology it supplies.
On the one hand, this has rendered China's pending (but not yet actualized) 'invasion' of Taiwan as another major fear narrative, while those in this audience, who believe there IS a Sovereign Alliance, and that Xi Jinping is a major figure in it understand that we're simply looking at the seeding for a re-run of the Russia-Ukraine narrative and all the exposures that might spin out from it.
But then, don't take my word for it. Take theirs.
That's right. Rutte—the current mascot of the globalist protectorate that is NATO—is attempting to pit Xi and Putin against one another, which gives away exactly what they fear.
And of course, what they SAY they fear isn’t quite what they actually fear, as the collectorate would like nothing more than to ‘be attacked’ by those they have programmed their blissfully ignorant—though growing less so by the month—subjects to view as the villains that were foretold, all the better to codify the narrative with.
So, what do they really fear?
Peace, which is the antithesis of all they have built their subversive empire atop.
SOME of you may even recall that I’ve been waiting for Taiwan to re-enter the chat since 2022, when I wrote the Taiwan Tipping piece for
.But again, WHO is this convergence exposing?
Rather, who is exposing themselves?
Who looks like they're posturing for a World War rather than a regional conflict between a 'parent' nation and its captured globalist regime proxy?
As if it wasn't clear this was the aim, they're literally naming alleged new Chinese seacraft "monsters," just in case the ghosts in the media machine thought the threat wasn't being communicated in a cartoonish enough manner.
How's that posturing going for the other proxy?
The one that falls most cleanly into the Our Boy template ourside of Biden, from where I'm sitting.
Talk about Whiplash … but not for us.
To wit, don’t think the machine hasn’t noticed the on-again, off-again leanings of their Prussian Proxy, ever since the latter discovered its collectivist masters never wanted peace, but much preferred the other thing.
I wrote about this at length in 2023, in a reader favorite, and I think it would be most illuminating to revisit in the context of the current battlespace.
Wolves at the Door
(Author’s Note: A reading of this special feature would be greatly enhanced by a read or re-read of the Righteous Russia series that started it all at Burning Bright, where we explore both the implied alliance between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and the latter’s goals in Prussian Ukraine, as well as the endgame I see brewing in this pivotal theater …
So, just as he did with Ukraine, Trump will rail against any action toward Taiwan for all the requisite face-saving we got a massive education regarding throughout the 12-day narrative war while the Sovereign Alliance forwards whatever regime-purgine actuals it must, with the narrative translation layers following on a delay, like ripples coming slowly to shore ... and no doubt we'll get replays of the Gulf of Tonkin incident (or a near miss of the same,) perhaps at the same time a Red Dawn, Crimson Tide scenario plays out in the Atlantic, and PERHAPS perhaps amidst once-more renewed tensions between Israel and Iran, further codifying and escalating the New Axis and Allies paradigm within the Collective Mind.
All the better to shatter it.
For, it has long been my assertion that Putin is not the war hawk in this scenario, but is rather an analogue to Sean Connery’s submarine commander from The Hunt for Red October ... as is Xi ... as is Trump, each manning his own respective actual ships—the nations each seek to save—in a sea of shifting narrative.
Peacemaker(s) was always PLURAL, as these three characters AND nations are the only ones with the power to mandate the change, and enforce it against those who would disrupt it, which is quite why they were the three jewels the Deep State once sought, and in unfortunate fact, once quite fully possessed.
That’s all changing, now. Rather, it HAS changed, even if it’s taking the new paradigm some time in settling as narrative bombs it took decades to set are being disarmed in half the time.
And there are LITTLE tells sprinkled amongst the big ...
‘First’ being the operative word.
Who is the invisible enemy, then?
Same it's always been.
But then, who were the Taliban, really? Who were they really terrorizing, really?
Who were we?
If the Taliban were not, or at least, ARE not our enemy, if various cells are forming legitimate governments all over the game board, and if the forever wars are being cleaned up by the respective (sovereign) power players in the emergent mesh of multipolarity we're seeing constructed before our eyes, but that most will not recognize until it's been here for years ... WHO was this alliance put together to oppose?
There are Sovereign Alliance pincers all over the game board, each able to operate in narrative battlespaces the others simply cannot for the respective weights they carry. Rather, that they've been saddled with.
Observe how the New Axis represented by Russia and China are making the inroads with Iran and all the proxies in the Middle East, North Korea and even Africa that the Trump admin has (publicly) kept at arm's length, while forwarding both actuals AND narratives (some very recent and very … BOMBastic) that have forced other, less peaceful parties to leave very much alone so that the sifting might lead to a needed settling.
This convergence between China and Iran—coming on the back of long-known coordination between Russia and Iran—forces the mass psychological connection point, adding context to the next chapter of the story as a continuation of the one that's been dominating the airwaves ... well, in spurts, at least—some lasting as long as 12 days—since October 7, 2023.
In order to make peace with the New Axis, Trump will have to be seen as a pragmatist, operating in the NEW battlespace laid out for him.
And the hints are there that it's already in motion, from the Doha Agreement being the silent codification of Trump's alliance with the Taliban—consummated during the Kabul withdrawal, which the CIA tried to botch through ISIS proxies—to the latest ...
This, my friends would have been geopolitical suicide just a few short years ago, when Trump didn't control the story of the modern conservative base, which has been radically transformed under his vision and direction.
The enemy have saddled the Collective Mind with leden Narratives attempting to prevent the coming together of the Peacemakers, which is as much a progression as a regression … back to the future we were told from the beginning, even if we didn’t quite recognize it at the time.
When it comes to conflating Russia, China and, well, Trump, then, the (no longer) Invisible Enemy is unwittingly providing a mirrored template to the seeding that's coming ALL the way back around in the form of the resurgence of the story that started it all for many in the Info War ... that being the ‘Russia Russia Russia’ hoax.
They’re even using the word, ‘Narrative’ in the midst of the retrospective.
To wit, somewhat lost in the noise of Iranian Nuclear Talks, the Big, Beautiful Bill drama and myriad other Trump narratives that make the news cycle spin, no doubt you've seen that Trump and Putin are speaking more often of late, in a series of phone calls ostensibly designed to explore an ending to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Israel-Iran crisis and much more.
While theorizing that the two leaders are working together behind the scenes in a much more overt manner than the normie layers will ever know is not uncommon in this community, I genuinely believe most still don't go far enough with the implications and gravitational evidence of their long-running alliance.
I've explored this in my writing at great length, but something I rarely talk about is that the enemy matrix actually first seeded this concept into the Collective Mind at the beginning of the (public facing) Saga of Donald Trump, at least when it comes to his injection into the political realm, which I have long said the Deep State took as an active declaration of war.
After all, isn't it interesting that the first major scandal they attempted to hit Trump with BEFORE and after taking office was the Russia Collusion hoax?
While most in the MAGAsphere have exhaustively documented and followed that narrative since its inception, they've also done so almost exclusively through the lens of exonerating Trump from any association with Russia at the time.
That said, one of my favorite refrains in the War of Stories, and one I return to often is an idea that just won't quit: what if Russia Collusion was real, and what if it was a good thing?
I often say that you can learn a lot, watching things lie, and I also say that the enemy often tells you the truth far more readily than some believe.
So, if they kicked off their Narrative War against Donald Trump by attempting to merge him in the public mind with Vladimir Putin, a man they had been engineering as the true endgame villain to their Western Globalist Hegemon, what if they were actually telling the truth, in a manner of speaking?
Keep in mind, the enemy rarely uses the term 'interference' when discussing the Russiagate Hoax. They use 'influence.'
So, what if the Russians absolutely DID 'influence' the results of the 2016 election by exposing the Clinton fraud for what it was, allowing both the Trump campaign and the American people to operate in a battlespace freed from a good deal of its would-be obfuscation?
What if Trump and Putin have been coordinating for a long time, on everything from the Denuclearization Narrative to the OTHER 'N' word, that being the 'Nazi Problem' Putin hasn't been able to keep out of his deployments since the Special Military Operation in Ukraine kicked off in 2022?
After all, I have long argued that Trump implemented Devolution at least partly to allow Putin to make that move. And I believe that goes both ways.
The enemy fears the Sovereign Alliance because they know it's real.
And it's winning.
Oh ... and when I say it’s all coming back around, I do mean it's ALL coming back around.
Talk about Convergence. Talk about Bicameral.
Now, we’ve got dueling Narratives absolutely drenching the DOJ from opposite sides of the awakening spectrum, as calls for Justice and Transparency regarding the Epstein Deployment are stalled—something I plan to discuss in greater detail in my next feature—while the first seeds actively sown by patriots in the Collective American Mind seem prepped for harvest after a brief spot of renewed germination.
While I can't pretend to see all the turns coming, nor what they signal, I do come away from the latest kaleidescopic chaos of the Info War with the firm belief that we're turning the game around on them.
In the end, while I do not know what I’ll be writing about in a month, never mind in a year, I do know I’ll be writing, and I do know we’ll be winning, if we continue to embrace the Process Paradigm I first wrote about several years ago.
Bright Brief - The Process Paradigm
If you’ve been paying attention, no doubt you’ve noticed the theme of acceleration as the Information War ramps up en route to what will be a turning point—if not necessarily an endpoint—in the ongoing Shadow War as we approach the 2022 Midterm Elections.
So, I have full confidence in putting a piece like this out the day before Trump claims he’ll be making a ‘major announcement’ regarding the Russia-Ukraine theater without knowing what that announcement will be, how it will summarily boost or supplant anything I’ve written here on the micro, or what each successive plot twist will entail as the War of Stories marches on because I believe we have the endgame in mind, as it’s one that recalls the very beginning of this story for many of us.
As I have argued many times, if you know the ending, the story can be reverse engineered.
So, have you caught the sovereign signal … or been caught by it?
Patriots know where it all began.
WE know where it all began.
Perhaps most importantly … THEY know where it all began.
And they’re desperate to be wrong about how it ends.
But until then, and in the midst of a war that isn’t just IN your Mind, but FOR it, do endeavor to stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.
And if you got anything out of this writing and appreciate the time and effort it takes to put it all together while juggling a day job with a glorious—and gloriously chaotic—infant, do consider supporting the work I do in the form of Paid Subscriptions to this publication (cancel at any time,) or one-time Coffee Donations.
Burning Bright’s goal is to provide a valuable resource for Truth, Discernment and Logic-Based Positivity, and all of my content is free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a Free or Paid Subscriber.
Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!
ALL members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.
Thank you BB, love these missives. Please keep up the great work, you are appreciated.
Thank you BB. Not a dull moment in the world these days.
A few questions:
1) I have read in several places that one of the major “goals” of a US/Russia proxy war was due to a perceived serious need for “denazification” of Ukraine that was creating longterm instability and increasing widespread corruption. Your thoughts?
2) Unless there is widespread loss of internet access in Ukraine, or censorship, I am wondering why there seems to be a dearth of phone images of destruction in Ukraine and Russia. Even in relative poverty, a phone seems to be an essential. I mean, people pose photos of all manner of daily minutiae, including their breakfast choice, so why have we not been flooded with images? Your thoughts?
3) The ones most likely to have a better overview of the ongoing longterm and current political, financial, structural, spiritual, and cultural condition of Ukraine would be spiritual leaders, in particular, Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk of the UGCC. And, yet, his statements are that Russia’s goal is to completely conquer Ukraine so as to impose the Russian Orthodox religion and wipe out the UGCC. Putin and Lavrov have insisted their terms are solely Crimea and the Donbas regions that have long been highly russified. Your thoughts?