Bright Brief - Pretty Pleas with Tribunals on Top

On 9/11, JFK and Generational Convergence

Bright Army!

First of all, do NOT get used to me pumping out a bunch of these in a row, you filthy, greedy, lovable Info War savages.

Mrs. Bright is visiting her family in Canada this week, which means I’m either evolving into my next, most ascended Anon form … or, perhaps more likely, devolving into a black hole of thinking about stuff all the time in between bouts of playing with my dog.

BUT … if I am going to not know what to do with myself, and if I AM going to think about stuff all the time, I might as well put it into some sort of digestible format for those of you who’ve been asking.

All of which is to say, I was absolutely blown away by the response to the return of the Bright Brief, which was apparently on a 15-month hiatus while I focused on putting immense psychological and creative pressure on myself to only produce long-form magnum opuses. I still plan to produce more of those, BUT, clearly a lot of you began following this blog in the first place because of the (relatively,) quick-hit, direct nature of the digs, which, again, focus on Narrative Warfare and Game Theory above all else.

Some of you even chose to send over coffee tips and paid subscriptions to this publication to encourage the continued production of the Briefs. Ask … and you shall receive.

(Seriously, though. Thank you for the support. I didn’t really know if producing free content was going to be viable in the long run, but this community clearly supports its own. And for those who simply subscribe for free, I value your feedback and support in other ways, especially when you share with people in need of a nice, polite rap upon the awakening door by the Truthful Tiger.)

Links to support this publication are always at the bottom. Until then, let’s talk about some stuff … briefly, of course.

---

Generational Convergence

---

No doubt most of you saw the news last week that a plea deal had been reached between the Defense Department and three of the supposed masterminds behind the 9/11 attacks … and no doubt, by now, most of you have seen that the Biden Regime’s (acting, perhaps in more ways than one?) Secretary of Defense has made the unprecedented move of undoing those agreements by rendering them null and void, using the Military Commissions Act of 2009 to do so.

So … there’s a LOT here, and I’m certainly not the Info War’s foremost authority on the subject of where Military authority begins and ends, which is why I’ll direct you to last night’s episode of the Devolution Power Hour with

Jon Herold

and

Patrick Gunnels

, who covered this issue in depth.

That said, from a Narrative perspective, I find this one-two-three combination to be highly cognitively delectable.

1. The Defense Department announces plea deals with the (alleged) 9/11 masterminds, apparently negating the possibility of death sentences and curtailing their ability to hold military tribunals, in which more information about the larger scale nature of that long-ago plot might be revealed to the American people.

2. MAGA pounces all over this decision by calling it a weak and feckless move by the establishment that announces to the world the west’s increasing capitulation to terrorism, and the lack of importance it places on the ideal of truth-gathering, disclosure and, well, awakening.

3. Sec Def Lloyd Austin abruptly reverses the plea agreement, apparently caving to the pressure (ie: the express mandate) of the American public in order to ensure the door to true justice (ie: the truth) is not closed on this seismic event in world history.

It’s simple enough, but I genuinely don’t think everyone is grasping just what’s playing out here from a Narrative perspective.

While I’ve gone back and forth on what colored hat Austin and many others that orbit the Biden Regime (or are ostensibly a part of it,) wear in the winding ways of the Shadow War, a focus on the plot structure of the current lay of the land sees establishment capitulation to the first principles desire for truth above all else.

That in and of itself would be a welcome narrative win, but what makes this particularly intriguing to me is the prospect that the very decision of the plea deals by Gen. Susan K. Escallier put the Biden Regime in the crosshairs of the Collective Mind in the first place.

But then, peep this headline from exactly one year ago, this month:

From the New York Times

And the following, relevant excerpt:

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III has chosen a former career Army lawyer who served in Iraq to oversee the Guantánamo war court, a job that includes approving plea deals and deciding whether prosecutors can seek death sentences.

In a memo signed this week, Mr. Austin said that Susan K. Escallier, the former Army lawyer, would become the convening authority for the Office of Military Commissions on Oct. 8. The current convening authority, Jeffrey D. Wood, will voluntarily leave the job on that date, Mr. Austin’s memo said.

Ms. Escallier will take over as the Pentagon has been reducing detention operations at the base. The prison, which held about 660 prisoners at its peak, now has 30 detainees and 900 guards and support staff members. Eleven of the detainees are charged with war crimes or have already been convicted.

In the meantime, the war court complex, Camp Justice, has been expanding under a program that began during the Trump administration. Contractors have been preparing a second, maximum-security courtroom, so two judges can hear cases simultaneously; new prefabricated administrative buildings; and more housing near the court.

Ms. Escallier retired from the Army in 2021 as a brigadier general after 32 years of service. She provided legal advice on the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and other issues there, and she was the senior lawyer in the subsequent campaign to defeat the Islamic State. — NYT

So … we’re told that Escallier replaced Jeffrey D. Wood of the Trump era, which would seem like a Deep State obfuscation effort on the surface … only for Escallier to apparently go off the reservation when it comes to handing down a highly controversial (and publicized) plea deal with 9/11 terrorists that the very man who appointed her felt compelled to undo in dramatic fashion within the week?

Folks, either we have a case of the Regime bowing to public pressure here, something they’ve never really been wont to do … or, we have a case of a Regime that doesn’t quite have the loyalty (or control, at the very least) over its own appointees as they might have thought.

(OR … the appointER is not playing on the same team as the appointEE … which I think is often the case in this war.)

And if you think the establishment approves of Austin’s about-face or capitulation … the Washington Post is signaling that they most certainly are not …

Now … this confluence of turns and counter-turns in the recent 9/11 narrative—along with the preponderance of Sovereign Alliance stalwart and known Donald Trump ally Mohammed bin Salman in the mass psychological zeitgeist in recent years—couldn’t possibly be signaling that patriot ghosts in the media machine have just successfully deployed a PsyOp in order to resurface and resurrect the public mandate for 9/11 disclosure, could it?

And that couldn’t POSSIBLY suggest that Lloyd Austin isn’t exactly what the Con Inc. media have told you he is, could it?

The deeper we go, the stranger—and more encouraging, with the right perspective—it all becomes.

Either way, the larger point I want to make here is that this very public and very dramatic about-face comes at a time when a growing plurality of the American people are calling for transparency and disclosure as the mass psychological walls close in on an increasingly-exposed regime that’s less transparent than ever.

Oh, and as

Jon Herold

was digging on this particular subject (the tribunals of it all,) he unearthed this rather juicy morsel regarding the infamous (to both sides of the Mind War,) Bill Barr.

To which I quipped,

You’re beginning to sound like you think there’s some sort of plan going on wherein military tribunals will be commonplace.

But that would only be necessary if there was some sort of long term insurgency that had infiltrated all levels of US government that required a COUNTERinsurgency to root out and expose to the American people using asymmetric means in order to both gauge and cultivate mandate from the people.

Next you’re going to tell me elections are fake.

In other words, when it comes to the one-two-three punch of the 9/11 plea deal, the reaction to that plea deal and the rescinding of that plea deal—leading to military tribunals and a cascade of public disclosure regarding the underlying truths of the whole charade, perhaps?—I believe this situation represents Exhibit #1,000 of why you have a choice of whether to react to the narrative cycle or let it pass through you, and observe the path it charts, Paul Atreides-style.

(For more on that particular refrain, check out one of my favorite long-forms around these parts, The Mind-Killer.)

---

---

The mass psychological value of the 9/11 plea deal has already been weaponized by Donald Trump and patriots in the Mind War, as it allowed them to paint the current regime as "friendly" to some of the most notorious patsies (err ... terrorists) in American history, while letting the implication hang that there remains information in the possession of these terrorists that could lead us back along the trail of breadcrumbs to the true masterminds of the most infamous day of the current century.

That right there isn’t just mandate cultivation, ladies and gentlemen of the awakening … it’s hope. Hope that the truth will have its day, because that truth is known to the people most in need of knowing it.

As we discussed this week, most Anons have a pretty good idea of where that trail leads. We can suggest with confidence that Donald Trump and patriots like Ezra Cohen-Watnick know EXACTLY where it leads, and how many branches it has.

Now, they're cultivating the public mandate to follow it.

9/11 ... JFK.

It's all coming back around.

As for why this convergence is significant?

Well, for years, I've been arguing that the prime unification point in the Info War would be the Narrative Convergence of the names John F. Kennedy and Donald J. Trump.

Long before a would-be assassin fully merged these names in the Collective American Psyche, paying attention to the story beats in a war made of them goes a long way toward understanding the how and why of the greatest story ever told.

We're going to like how this movie ends, because we've seen most of it before ...

From December 2023, in Temporal Trump Card:

There are many paths to awakening. ALL start with questions, and JFK remains one of the biggest American questions of all … one we know Trump has the answer to, and one the Collective Mind may be nearing a unification point regarding.

But these Mind-Movers are not just from our time. They’re also the ghosts of the past reanimated by the power of questions, and the answer that binds them all together: that the truth doesn’t become the truth. It always was.

You can read that full feature here, and I think you should, because it’s pretty good …

---

---

(I know I keep dropping long-form bait in here, but, guys, these are pretty relevant, and it might even convince some of you Brief savages to set aside the time to read one or two of them.)

THIS is the mass psychological Battlespace we’re currently witnessing form within the Collective Mind, and it’s why, not just despite, but BECAUSE of the engineered chaos of the Info War, I feel more positive than ever before that disclosure (and therefore, TRUTH and all its ensuing and unifying catharsis) are not only possible, but inevitable.

The assassination attempt on Donald Trump and his seizing of the narrative directly following it has completely upended the current Battlespace in the Collective American mind.

This accelerated, escalated story cycle has converged the Kennedy and Trump names and legacies, and triggered the emergence of new shatterpoints in the awakening.

My friend

Just Human

and I discussed this at length in a recent episode of DEFECTED:

And so, when you zoom out and take in the entirety of the Battlespace that IS the Collective American Mind, and when you pass seeming contradictions coming out of who we’re told are regime characters through your evolving cognitive filter, you might see why I personally say that arguing over Actuals in a war based on the corruption and subversion of information itself is largely anathema to awakening.

The 'War of Stories' isn't meant to be some cute refrain that sums up the writing at Burning Bright.

Humans are encoded with logical frameworks, which simply describes a process through which we order information.

The reason the enemy has been in control for so long is because they've employed the Hegelian Dialectic, which is a logic pathway that uses human attachment to plot structure and logical progression in order to guide toward predetermined outcomes masquerading as choices.

A story does not need to be TRUE to be compelling, or to cultivate changes within the mind of the reader. That is why the key to winning the Info War is in telling the most compelling (and therefore, convincing) STORY.

It just so happens that a story that is both compelling AND true will always win in a mass psychological battlespace stretched to its logical (and spiritual) shatterpoints.

Then again, I’m literally just some man-tiger pontificating into the void, so what do I know?

Until next time, stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.

---

Burning Bright’s goal is to provide a valuable resource for Truth, Discernment and Logic-Based Positivity, and all of my content is free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a Free or Paid Subscriber.

Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!

ALL members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.