(Author’s Note: If you’ve been enjoying these writings, please consider supporting this work by upgrading to a Paid Subscription on this platform, which actually ensures more of your dollar reaches its final destination than most other platforms in the Info War. You can cancel at any time.
If you’d like to leave a one-time tip by Buying Me a Coffee, you can always do that, too.
If you’re some mix of upset and amused that I keep calling long-forms ‘Briefs’ in a masterful fifth-generation inversion, then feel free to continue NOT supporting this work … OR, subvert your disappointment by doing one of the above anyway.
Or you can just read it and share it if you like it. That’s also fine. Relax.)
First of all, I’d be remiss if I didn’t remind you that my focus on the Narrative War, which I’ve dubbed the War of Stories is not only more practical to follow in the winding ways of the Info War, but also more ‘Actual’ than reported actuals tend to be of late; it’s a beautiful and intentional paradox, given the latest proof just landed that we’re watching a movie in just about the most literal manner you could imagine.
From my friend
:And to which I responded:
That’s right, folks. Whatever Actuals are in effect on the Game Theory Game Board have been put in place specifically FOR the Narrative War we’re seeing play out, and yes, that we’re actively participating in as the War of Stories rages on.
After all, the Narrative War—the Info War itself—is a feature of the Great Awakening, and not a bug. It IS the battlefield, as far as we’re concerned, rather than being a distraction layered atop it.
As for the latest chapter of that war?
It’s been dominated by the initial gravity preceding and following the first debate between Trump and (checks notes for latest Establishment Mask) cackling, sneering, oh-so-girlboss! Kamala Harris.
In the lead-up, the pervading sense out of the System wasn’t quite as surefooted as their demeanor immediately following might suggest. The Establishment wasn’t terrified of the prospect of the debate because they’re worried about the platform of the Kamala campaign. (There IS no platform other than the communist globalist status quo.) They were terrified because, in the absence of public mandate, all they have is the ILLUSION of public mandate, and that comes on the back of a story—one Trump front-ran with Joe Biden, and that he mirrored with Harris.
That’s why there was widespread acknowledgement of a stall-out ahead of the debate. It wasn’t a stall-out of genuine support. It was a stall out of the story of that support … meaning the suspension of disbelief had run its course, which is par for the course as patriots continue to accelerate enemy deployments.
October surprises don’t tend to age well when they’re actualized in August, after all, and Donald Trump, the orange man himself is the best summoner of sunlight we have at work in the Info War … all the better to burn out the enemy simply by exposing them to those who had not the eyes to see them before.
As for the persuasion of the ‘Debate’ itself, my immediate reaction was as follows:
So, Kamala Harris & company have chosen ... death. At least, in the public mind, and they've done so by doubling down on Orange Man Bad!
That's no surprise, but her angles of attack (meaning the System's angles,) beggar belief for those paying attention, as she attacked Trump not on his perceived weaknesses, but on his overwhelming strengths throughout.
For his part, Trump went through the greatest hits of the 2024 campaign, which mirror the greatest hits of 2020 & 2016.
That doesn't win voters with TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome,) unfortunately, but it does present the one thing the Establishment cannot: consistency.
Consistency of presence, of vision ... of principles.
It's all about the story, and Trump has been telling the same one since his ascension in the American Zeitgeist, and yes, even BEFORE he came down that golden escalator.
Ultimately, you can't win a War of Stories with a story AGAINST ... you must have a story FOR.
Americans know what Trump is fighting FOR.
What are [they] fighting for?
In the end, the Deep State didn’t lose support for a competent candidate this week. It lost whatever remained of the illusion of public mandate for what Kamala Harris and her campaign represented, which is ostensibly the “anyone but Trump” storyline … and they lost it emphatically, no matter what the carrion crows that make up the corporatist media effected in their bizarre reanimation ritual in the immediate aftermath of the clown show.
In fact, the fact that they DID defend Kamala could itself be seen as some evidence of narrative—and thus, game theory—paralysis as the Collective Mind enters a strained, increasingly tense holding pattern in a window that is oh so close and yet, oh so far from election night, the next major inflection point in an asymmetric war defined by them.
So, when you see Kamala’s team openly calling for a second debate in the wake of this one, with the media machine cheering her on, take a page out of my friend Zak Paine’s book and recognize it for what it is: the hunted taking the bait, once again, while The Master sits just off screen, ready and waiting to all too gladly present the Establishment the opportunity to proudly, breathlessly and even brazenly brand itself as the very System they ostensibly represent continues to crumble around them, both nationally and globally, by their own admission.
Keep in mind, even BEFORE the actualization of the debate, the media industrial complex revealed that the system is currently at the stage where they're BREAKING news about the person they say is LEADING national polling ahead of the most contentious election cycle (since the last one) actually having to put out policy proposals ahead of a nationally-televised debate.
The framing here was inverted; it's meant to suggest that only Orange Man Bad and his vocal, based and logical supporters expect the supposed opposition to actually have a platform she's ostensibly meant to defend/argue in front of the American people.
The truth that this community has known for some time, and that is becoming clear to an increasing plurality of the American electorate is that Harris is merely the latest in a long line of proxy candidates who have no platform other than that which the machine funnels through them.
The thing is, in earlier chapters of the Info War, they could flaunt this platform flagrantly. Now, they're silent-running on the back of four years of the apparent implementation OF the very agenda they know they can’t hitch their public wagon to, which is why you’ve seen them simultaneously promote their latest proxy princess as experienced, while promising that said experience won’t necessarily presage her actions should the reins of the system be wrapped firmly around her gnarled fingers next.
That’s not just paralysis, folks … that's retreat.
To the American people, you see, Kamala is less an empty promise and more a pregnant threat—not of directed evil, but of chaos, something the establishment is now signaling with abandon as the Deep State Archipelago splinters further, unsure whether to close ranks or cut bait on the story of the last four years … again.
Which is quite by design, just not theirs.
You see, Trump had nothing to fear ahead of the debate, regardless of the breathless prognostication and analysis conducted by both the establishment media and the Con Inc. ‘influencer’ class that has branded themselves—and that is the operative word—as its opposition, and who continue to reveal themselves with rabid abandon to a dug-in America First, ‘Trump or Bust’ electorate; Trump doesn’t need a story this time around after two successful presidential elections—as long as you’re read up on the Devolution theory—because Trump IS the story. He is a cognitive cypher and now a mass cultural symbol that is transforming before our eyes into a signal, one of the future and for it, and inspired by a golden past.
And if you don’t believe that, listen to the machine itself and its latest mouthpiece, who can’t seem to pen a headline or a talking point that doesn’t orbit the Orange Man as its north star and its guiding light.
Donald Trump is getting stronger, while the Establishment is closing ranks in an ironic and inevitable, overt display of weakness. Which is why I STILL won’t entirely dismiss the prospect of earlier ‘Change of Batter’ predictions coming to pass as the machine spends what precious little ammunition it has remaining.
While Trump is displaying as easy a manner as he has in ages just two months removed from an apparent attempt on his life and just a few months before the actualization of a criminal case that's not actually going to do anything to him, Kamala Harris is alternating between demonizing Trump's agenda while aping many of its core tenets—something the man pointed out himself throughout the debate.
This is causing the rare bit of cognitive dissonance in the minds of the collectivist collectorate that's not actually intentional (by the bad guys, anyway,) as the very regime that has attempted to distance itself from border security and economic strife is now attempting to do an about-face on both while denying they're doing anything of the sort.
They're also trying to reboot 2008's ‘Hope & Change’ campaign while doubling down on the obvious failures of their current leadership.
Now, do you STILL think they actually feel in charge?
You see, while the story the System would tell has positioned Kamala as a rival to Trump, she is being seen more accurately—branded, more consistently—as the mask his true enemy wears, which is to say, OUR true enemy.
Trump provoking the machine into revealing itself—Obamas, Bushes, Cheneys and all—is less about him, and less about them, and more about us. He’s showing the American people by forcing them to show themselves.
Sunlight, after all, is anathema to vampires.
In other words, we have the truth, and Trump is its current champion, which is why he remains ours, and is why this particular statement of his hit like a lightning bolt when it landed earlier this month:
Much like Trump’s many pronouncements ahead of and directly following November 3, 2020, and the skewed events and narratives of January 6, 2021, this one carries with it the weight of law, in my estimation, and Bicameral Hope on either side of the attempted or (temporarily) successful 2024 election steal paradigms … suggesting that, in either scenario, we win OR they lose.
And yes … the statement absolutely DOES feature the word “devolve” quite prominently, pointing to the latest in a cascade of comms that may or may not be (but totally are) pointing to the veracity of the aforementioned
’s research on the subject.Additionally, this month, we had Mark Zuckerberg, the most notorious of the social media censor czars disclosing what those of us who've been on the wrong end of it already knew: he hasn't just carried water for the Globalist regime, but has actually acted as a key vector of its enforcement arm. And there’s plenty more where that came from.
To wit, at the same time, the current epicenter of faux Globalist power, France recently held the founder of the most open social media platform in the world, Telegram in prison on a cascade of charges that wouldn't look out of place in an Orwell novel.
He just so happens to be Russian.
Oh … and there’s this:
To some, these convergences are signs of enemy control.
To me, they're signs of enemy panic, and patriot narrative control.
In a war defined by the dissemination, obfuscation and cultivation of information itself, censorship is an act of war, and those who engage in it should and likely will be considered enemy combatants, at least when it comes time for the (new) justice system to take a look at them.
Trump's Narrative Deployment re: jailing those who engage in election interference was timed perfectly with Brazil's actions re: Elon Musk and France's re: Pavel Durov.
While any of these deployments can be analyzed on their own, when stitched together, they form a tapestry of the current lay of the land that is the Information War, drawing a clear line of demarcation between the globalist hegemon and those who increasingly stand against them.
So, in the midst of short-term, ‘seeming’ wins on the part of the collectivist superstate, I believe Trump is both threatening and codifying. He’s telling those still sitting on the fence that they’ll have to hop off of it soon, or else take their chances with the globalist regime ahead of the advent of a second Trump Administration, which is signaling how it will handle servants of said regime.
Sometimes … you just have to sit back and let the simulation run, breaking the cardinal sin in furtherance of the awakening.
To wit, some of the most viral headlines coming out of the Media Industrial Complex aren’t doing so because they’re sensational, as would have been the case a decade ago; they’re not even doing so because they’re inversions, as has been the case in recent years.
Instead, headlines are going viral because they’re sort of just stating the truth, replete with commentary that completely inverts it in the aftermath.
For example, if a Constitution-loving American patriot were to pen a header discussing Donald Trump’s recent alliances and narrative deployments, it might look an awful lot like the one Axios put out recently. And yet, Axios not only felt confident in putting forward the prospect that Trump’s new transition team prided itself on constitutional values, but actually thought it would DAMAGE said team, and the campaign as a whole.
This observation results in a tantalizing Bicameral: either the enemy really is this stupid, as they’re successfully branding the America First movement as, well, constitutional … or patriot ghosts in the media machine are in complete control of the 4am talking points.
Either way, I feel fine.
Ultimately, THEY are the ones whose masks have slipped in an era directly following mass global lockdowns and vaccine mandates, mass othering, mass censorship and targeted sanctions & proxy war funding in order to keep the machine humming along.
In other words, this is not the environment in which to lecture or cast stones to an American public increasingly stretched to a breaking point … also known as a Shatterpoint, which we shouldn’t shy away from, but welcome with open arms, and open eyes.
(I’m particularly proud of this one, so you should read it or something …)
Lately, I've wondered if the War of Stories is getting easier to parse, or if our discernment has simply leveled up sufficiently to make the difference moot.
Perhaps it's both, as we've had the most beautiful Bicameral development of the Info War, with the Establishment closing ranks around their newest fake candidate, trotting out every legacy regime name in the book in a surreal attempt to convince the Collective American Mind to consent to another four years of open Deep State rule.
On the other side of the bracket, we have the most infamous man in the world breaking ranks with the Republicans of yesteryear in order to forge the most unified sociopolitical coalition in recent American history, and doing so on the back of one of the most successful first administrations in history.
In other words, he's promising to improve what was already great to begin with.
The Old Guard is fully exposed as a new American Fellowship forms.
Almost like it was written this way.
The Establishment has painted Trump as a brute, a tyrant and a monster, while his most loyal and longtime supporters have proudly adorned the colors of the very ‘deplorables’ label another dark princess who never quite became a queen bestowed upon them.
We are the deplorables, the Anons, the awakened … the frogs that may herald the ending of one age, and the dawning of another.
And Trump is our Great MAGA King, which is less a meme and more a bit of narrative magic that has yet to run its wick to a bright burst of an ending [for them,] and a new beginning (for us.)
And so, the Deep State has closed ranks around its newest Proxy Princess, but unlike the subversive communist drivel that would make her Marxist father proud, I don’t think this particular fairy tale is going to have the ending they had in mind.
After all, a wise book once told us that the Great Power within and without this world threatened that, in the end, He would send frogs to destroy them.
Oh … did I say ‘threatened?’
How about ‘promised?’
Until next time, stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.
Burning Bright’s goal is to provide a valuable resource for Truth, Discernment and Logic-Based Positivity, and all of my content is free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a Free or Paid Subscriber.
Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!
ALL members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.
Is Kamala a real fake candidate? I am considered one of the five best people in America for knowing the history and intent of the Framers decision for an Article II natural born Citizen doing a deep dive into Harris' bio, I am convinced she is not even a citizen of the United States when she was appointed a senator.
The 14th Amendment states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Now looking at her bio it would appear that she was born in California, but the phrase " subject to the jurisdiction" is the key.
While most think that this means the children of Ambassadors are not "subject to the jurisdiction," but the United States Code, specifically the Selective Service Act carves out another set of people who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and that class of people are those who entered the United States of non-immigrated visas.
From the Selective Service, "Non-immigrant men living in the United States on a valid visa are not required to register for as long as they remain on a valid visa up until they turn 26."
From Kamala's bio both her parents were here in the US, on a nonimmigrant visa (F1) and under 26 at the time of her birth. And while this question has never been decided by our courts, it certainly casts a blazing light on her Constitutional qualifications to call herself an Article II, natural born Citizen.
While Obama had an American mother to hide any perceived lack of natural born citizenship behind, Kamala does not. It is fair to call her out on this after all she is in her own words a great California prosecutor.
After studying this subject for over 12 years I am always pulled back to John Jay's letter to George Washington, "permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen." At the very least the 14th Amendment did not "wash" Kamala of the foreign allegiance owed by her parents and thus that foreign (Jamaican and Indian) allegiance was also transferred to her.
Here is the dirty little secret of natural born Citizenship the deep state does not want America to know. And that is the government does not create natural born Citizens, the citizens themselves are the instrument that creates the natural born Citizen. Natural does not mean born or the phrase natural born would mean "born born" and that is obviously wrong. What it does natural mean; it means 'related by blood," so a natural born Citizen is someone who is related by blood to a United States citizen at the time of their birth.
So to answer the question is she a real fake candidate, that answer is no she miss that make by a parsec. Judging by the facts in both Kamala's story and Barry O's story. Obama was a real fake candidate because he could hide his lack of natural born Citizenship behind his mother. For Kamala to hide her lack of natural born citizenship, Einstein would need to hide his theory of Relativity in a bad acid trip.
The pregnant threat to me (last night at least) was that the Princess’ contorted face might suddenly break open and release a horrific eruption of baby spiders. I am still thankful that it was not actualized.