This feature is a spiritual successor to Temporal Trump Card, and is best read with that framing in mind.
In the ever-unfolding War of Stories, timing emerges not as mere happenstance, but as a deliberate inflection point, a signal flare in the fog of collective deception.
Picture the scene: the recent slithering return of John Bolton, that neoconservative specter from the unipolar abyss hurling barbs at Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin precisely as the Sovereign Alliance accelerates the very Arc of the Peacemakers I’ve been writing about since launching this publication in 2022.
Bolton's diatribes, laced with the desperation of a fading hegemon coincide with Trump's orchestration of historic accords—from the fragile thaw in Ukraine to the realignments in Armenia and Azerbaijan—exposing the narrative engineers' frantic attempts to prop up their crumbling script. It's as if the globalist scriptwriters, sensing the inversion of their own dialectics are deploying their faded villains to shore up a facade that's cracking under the weight of truth.
Yet, in this theater of inverted dialectics, such attacks only amplify the peacemakers' momentum, where Trump, Putin and their sovereign counterparts steer us not toward escalation, but a multipolar renaissance, a dawn where sovereignty supplants endless conflict.
This engineered timing isn't coincidence; it's the method to the madness we've been unraveling since the shadows of 2016 began to dissipate, like a detective piecing together clues in a decades-long mystery.
And now, as if summoned by the same temporal architects who script these re-runs, we stand on the precipice of a premiere that could shatter the cognitive dissonance walls erected since 2001:
’s documentary, Codex 9/11, which originally inspired this writing.This isn't just another retrospective on that fateful day; it's a potential 737-sized breach in the matrix of manufactured consent, resurfacing the raw truths of September 11th at a moment when the collective mind is primed for disclosure.
Zerbo's work, with its meticulous recounting of inconsistencies, foreknowledge and the engineered aftermath of that PsyAct serves as a cypher—a bicameral temporal fulcrum that pivots between past deceptions and future unifications. Imagine it as a key turning in a long-locked door, revealing rooms filled with suppressed memories.
In an era where the Sovereign Alliance is dismantling the very war machines that profited from 9/11's fallout, this documentary isn't mere history; it's a catalyst for mass awakening, bridging the chasms of bipartisan distrust and generational amnesia, much like a family reunion where long-buried secrets finally surface to heal old wounds.
To grasp the profundity of this moment, however, we must delve into the timelines that converge here: the Trump era echoing the Kennedy epoch, not as mere historical parallels, but as deliberate re-runs in a Timeline War waged against the Deep State.
As I've explored in depth in the past, the Temporal Trump Card isn't just a clever turn of phrase; it's the philosophical core of this shadow conflict. It posits that the past informs the future, but more radically, that a projected future reshapes our understanding of the past and present.
Donald Trump, that disruptor incarnate embodies this concept.
Born into elite circles, yet rallying the working class with unapologetic sovereignty, Trump mirrors John F. Kennedy's anti-establishment maverickism. Both men challenged the administrative bloat, the intel agencies' overreach and the central banking leviathan that Eisenhower warned us about in his farewell address.
Yes, Kennedy, fresh from the Bay of Pigs fiasco sought to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces; And yes, Trump, through his Devolution Operation and relentless exposures most of you found your way into the Info War on the back of has effectively begun that task. But the connections run deeper, into the philosophical sinews of power projection and energy distribution.
Kennedy's assassination in 1963 wasn't an endpoint on this timeline, but a disruption—a forced divergence from the Eisenhower-Kennedy story of civilian oversight and nuclear optimism.
Eisenhower identified the military-industrial complex as the "problem," a vampiric entity siphoning national vitality for endless wars, like a parasite draining the lifeblood of a once-vibrant host. Kennedy reacted with bold strokes: withdrawing from Vietnam's quagmire, emphasizing special operations over conventional hegemony and daring to confront the Federal Reserve's grip.
Yet the Deep State, that shadowy consortium of intel operatives, bankers and warmongers have seemingly dominated the intervening decades.
From the Gulf of Tonkin lie that escalated Vietnam to the engineered chaos of Desert Storm, their playbook was one of false flags and proxy conflicts, culminating in the grand deception of 9/11, a bicameral narrative fulcrum to their engineered past and future, and one we stand on the precipice of reversing.
Enter Trump as the "solution," reinstituting civilian control over the Department of Defense and exposing the corruption that festered unchecked. His mandate, cultivated through narrative seeds like the declassification of JFK files promises not just justice, but catharsis on the back of a mass American unification event.
Imagine the ripple: 9/11 truth, intertwined with JFK disclosure revealing the same enemies at work, the ones we’ve been tracking for years.
The Bushes, the Clintons, the legacy intel apparatus—these aren't disparate villains, but recurring characters in a scripted rerun, like actors reprising roles in a never-ending drama.
On the other side of the ledger, old faces return to the fore. Howard Lutnick, Rudy Giuliani and Trump himself, all skeptics of the official 9/11 narrative have voiced doubts born from personal loss and insider insight.
Lutnick lost his brother in the towers; Giuliani navigated the rubble; Trump, ever the builder questioned the physics of collapse. Under this framing, their shared skepticism heralding their eventual convergence in the America First coalition and the second public Trump Administration isn't coincidence; it's a thread in the Grand RICO Conspiracy that’s going to bring the whole diseased, corrupt temple down on their collectivist heads, which I've long argued extends far beyond Russiagate and to the foundational sins of 9/11 and before.
This begs the question: How much of the Trump era's chaos is organic, and how much is a trap laid for narrative translation?
The method to the madness reveals itself in the patterns, like a storyteller weaving motifs through chapters.
Under this framing, Russiagate, that poisoned well, wasn't just an assault on Trump; it was a preemptive strike against any alliance with Russia, recalling the foundational arguments in the series that started it all on Burning Bright.
Through this lens, my oft-repeated, only somewhat tongue in cheek refrain that "Russia Collusion is real, and a good thing" transforms from heresy to revelation.
It's not about criminality, but coordination against a common foe—the globalist Deep State that engineered 9/11 as a pretext for endless war.
Trump's "collusion" with Putin in this context isn't subversion; it's the reclamation of sovereignty, echoing Kennedy's overtures toward Khrushchev amid the Cuban Missile Crisis, as both eras faced the specter of World War III, fomented by the same hegemon seeking to perpetuate division, like puppeteers pulling strings to keep the audience—that’s us, by the way—in fear.
To truly apprehend this fulcrum's power, though, we must immerse ourselves in the realities of the Timeline War, where the Temporal Trump Card tying Trump to Kennedy serves as the philosophical linchpin.
This isn't just a metaphor; it's the core mechanic of the shadow conflict, positing that timelines aren't linear, but malleable—past events reframed by projected futures, reshaping present perceptions.
Donald Trump embodies this fusion of past and future in the present: a disruptor born of elite strata, yet one who champions the forgotten, inverting the establishment's game. His timeline echoes John F. Kennedy's not as parallel lines, but converging arcs in a deliberate war against temporal domination.
The Deep State has long manipulated these timelines, engineering crises from Vietnam's Gulf of Tonkin fabrication to 9/11's engineered unity-through-trauma. But, in my personal estimation, the Temporal Trump Card flips the script: by projecting a sovereign future, Trump retroactively exposes past sins, catalyzing a temporal catharsis where awakening dissolves dissonance.
Fleshing out this catharsis demands examining the policy and historical convergences between Kennedy and Trump, spotlighting the identical enemies they confronted, as both men challenged the administrative state's bloat and the military-industrial complex's vampiric grip—Eisenhower's "problem" personified.
Kennedy, post-Bay of Pigs vowed to splinter the CIA into oblivion, recognizing it as a rogue entity fueling endless conflict, much like a wildfire specifically set and engineered to spread unchecked. Trump, through his Devolution Operation and relentless declassifications and purging of the administrative state has effectively initiated that splintering, purging deep-state embeds and reinstating civilian oversight over the Department of Defense.
What’s more, policy echoes abound: Kennedy's withdrawal from Vietnam's quagmire mirrored Trump's extrication from Afghanistan and Syria, both rejecting proxy wars that enrich the complex at sovereignty's expense.
Historically, both navigated assassination attempts—Kennedy's fatal, Trump's survived—amid smears from the same intel-media apparatus.
The enemies?
The Bushes, Clintons and legacy spooks, recurring villains in this Grand RICO Conspiracy extending from JFK's era to Russiagate.
Finally, Kennedy similarly faced down the Federal Reserve's stranglehold while Trump audits its shadows.
Both prioritized energy independence—Kennedy through nuclear optimism, Trump via that even in the midst of fossil-fuel resurgence—against globalist cartels.
Overall, these mirrors I’ve been writing about since 2023 at the very least offer a philosophical continuity, where sovereignty trumps collectivist control, painting a story of heroes rising against an entrenched darkness.
Yet these connections transcend domestic policy, weaving into the Russia thread, where Kennedy navigated an eerily identical geopolitical minefield with Nikita Khrushchev as Trump has with Putin.
The Western warmongers, ever eager for Hegelian horrors sought to engineer Kennedy and Khrushchev into nuclear Armageddon during the Cuban Missile Crisis, much as they've pitted Trump against Putin in Ukraine's proxy quagmire. But both pairs evaded the trap through backchannel communications and a shared trust in sovereign, moral imperatives.
Kennedy and Khrushchev exchanged voluminous correspondence, using unofficial conduits to defuse tensions, emphasizing mutual survival over ideological brinkmanship, like two captains steering ships away from icebergs in the dead of night.
Kennedy's Vienna summit with Khrushchev built rapport amid Cold War hysteria; Trump's Helsinki and Alaska engagements echo this, inverting Russiagate's poison into alliance seeds. Both avoided World War III by prioritizing humanity over hegemony, proving the Timeline War's victors are those who reclaim narrative sovereignty, transforming potential catastrophe into tales of improbable alliance.
Similarly, Trump and Putin have employed discreet channels to sidestep the doom engine, if not to cut it off entirely, and perhaps—in my personal estimation—to reveal it in the light of an awakening sun, where all its sins will be laid bare of its own accord as it shrivels and burns.
At their core, these leaders recognized that peoples crave peace, not war—unless tricked by false flags and media psyops.
This temporal catharsis extends to JFK Jr., whose meteoric rise and tragic fall in the American zeitgeist marked a profound demoralization—and perhaps a subterranean call to arms—for the modern patriot movement.
As many reading this know, the heir to Camelot's mystique launched George magazine in 1995, blending politics with pop culture to challenge establishment narratives, like a young knight wielding wit against dragons, and perhaps—in the estimation of many—signaling his knowledge of the true war beneath the war, the one that claimed the life of his father, and later, his own.
By 1999, rumors swirled of his eyeing New York's Senate seat, the very one Hillary Clinton infamously coveted and claimed after his death.
Of course, his plane crash that July, amid foggy skies and, frankly, bullshit narratives like ‘pilot inexperience’ fuel conspiracies to this day—of deep-state orchestration to clear Clinton's path. Hillary, after all, was fresh from her Watergate role, where she helped dismantle Richard Nixon—a Trump mentor figure through shared anti-establishment grit—and continues to orbit JFK Jr.'s story like a narrative black hole.
In the context of the war against the same intel apparatus these other American stalwarts faced down before him—and no doubt after—JFK Jr.'s demise, whether accident or artifice symbolizes the Deep State's grip, and perhaps ignited a latent resistance that could finally break it, whispering through the cultural fringes that Camelot's flame endures, a story of loss fueling rebirth that doesn’t just continue, but culminates in the modern day.
Trump's callbacks to the Reagan era further illuminate this resistance, with the MAGA branding—echoing Reagan's "Let's Make America Great Again" slogan—serving as proof that patriots have battled the Deep State's subversion since JFK's assassination.
Reagan, for his part represented a post-assassination pushback: dismantling regulatory overreach, confronting Soviet collectivism and revitalizing American exceptionalism against the administrative state's creep. Surviving his own assassination attempt, Reagan embodied resilience, much as cultural artifacts spurred declassification calls, linking the eras.
Yet, as we know, his battle too was entirely uphill: Reagan's survival contrasted the loss of both JFK’s, but both underscored the Deep State's persistence.
Until now, with patriots ascendant—actually through devolution, continuity of government and other apparatus we’ll never be able to suss out entirely, narratively via awakening—the Timeline War tilts toward sovereignty, as probes reveal hidden truths, turning fragmented stories into a cohesive epic.
Shifting to the Burden of Peace, we see how this temporal cypher extends to the Sovereign Alliance's origins, provoked in the smoldering aftermath of 9/11.
It's not merely about Trump and Putin, then; it's about the plan to counter the globalist doom engine, ignited by their most audacious move of the century.
To wit, Zerbo’s aforementioned masterwork sent me down my own 9/11 rabbit hole, wherein I discovered the following:
In 2003, as the Western hegemon lined up for the Iraq invasion under the banner of "weapons of mass destruction," it appears that one leader stood vehemently opposed: none other than Vladimir Putin.
He warned that the war was a grave mistake, fraught with casualties and regional destabilization, echoing concerns for Russia's Muslim population and broader international order. This opposition marked a turning point in U.S.-Russia relations, shattering Putin's early post-9/11 overtures—closing Soviet bases, allowing U.S. forces in Central Asia and supporting the hunt for Al-Qaeda in the Caucasus.
Putin's pushback, then wasn't isolationist; it was prescient, like a sentinel spotting storm clouds on the horizon.
He accused the U.S. of regime change in Syria and Libya, succeeding in the latter but failing in the former amid Russian intervention. By 2015, as ISIS rampaged, Putin took center stage in Syria, dismantling the terrorist proxy that Trump himself had accused U.S. elements of founding.
This mirrored Trump's pre-presidential stance, forging an unspoken alignment.
From where I’m sitting, the Maidan Coup in 2014, that CIA-orchestrated pivot pulling Ukraine into NATO's orbit was the final provocation, leading to Crimea's reclamation and the eventual—and, in my personal view, Trump-approved and amplified—Special Military Operation in the Donbas. What the West decried as aggression, Putin framed as denazification—reclaiming ethnic Russian enclaves through referendums, countering the proxy war machine.
In this post-9/11 narrative, Putin emerges as the lone major player willing to defy the Western doom engine, paving the way for his unification arc with Trump.
The Sovereign Alliance—comprising Russia, China, India and emerging partners like Saudi Arabia and the UAE—is literally the orbit Putin cultivated in response to the War on Terror. Trump, through deals like the Abraham Accords and Belt and Road integrations is now bringing the NATO establishment to heel, helping Putin and other members of the Sovereign Alliance to fully invert the Axis and Allies paradigm.
So, in the wake of Vietnam, Desert Storm and 9/11 … have we been the baddies all along?
Certainly in the eyes of those who suffered the War OF Terror—from Vietnam's napalm scars to Iraq's depleted uranium legacy.
And yet, the sins rest on the shoulders of those who knew: the Deep State architects who turned 9/11 into a template for Hegelian horrors, recalling the Gulf of Tonkin, Bay of Pigs and even the Iranian incubator babies Zerbo exposes in his documentary.
Trump, then, isn't merely the leader of this alliance; he's the first American president since Kennedy whom the Russians could trust to avert World War III, a scenario the globalists have fomented since 1962. Russiagate's poison extended to both, framing Russia as the eternal enemy to obscure their shared battle against collectivism.
Yet unification beckons: bipartisan, as Trump and Kennedy timelines expose Bushes and legacy Dems alike; generational, linking JFK's assassination to 9/11 truth; and East-West, brothers under God, dissolving a century of subversion through two world wars and proxy conflicts.
On a temporal level, 9/11 is the bicameral cypher to exposure and disclosure; on a psychospiritual plane, it's the key to awakening and unification.
All roads led to 9/11, in other words—the engineered geopolitical pivot—and all since lead back, a template for deceptions from Vietnam to Ukraine. The invasion's legacy eroded international law, creating space for bad actors while exposing Western hypocrisy.
But the bill of truth is coming due.
As the Sovereign Alliance inverts these narratives, Codex 9/11 and other American-made, sovereign-born narrative deployments not delivered to us from patriots sitting on high, but delivered TO THEM from us down below primes the collective mind for the ultimate inflection: a cathartic reckoning where enemies are unmasked, heroes reclaimed and peace burdens no more, but frees.
In this Timeline War, then, the Temporal Trump Card plays out not in isolation, but as part of a grand symphony.
So, as I wind my way toward some semblance of a conclusion in a piece that likely skirts the line between logos and stream of consciousness, let’s revisit the notes of that symphony, as I hear them, and as I think you can, if you listen closely to the echoes between the beats.
Eisenhower's warning, Kennedy's boldness, Trump's disruption—they form a continuum, interrupted, but now resuming.
The Deep State's dominance, from post-WWII subversion to 9/11's engineered unity-through-fear crumbles under the weight of disclosure.
Zerbo's film, arriving amid Trump's peacemaking and Putin's steadfastness isn't just documentation; it's detonation. It blows open the dissonance, revealing how the same characters—the intel overlords, the war profiteers—have scripted our divisions.
Then, consider the re-runs: Vietnam's draft-dodging elite echoing Iraq's no-bid contracts; Northwoods' false flags prefiguring 9/11's anomalies. The madness has method—to perpetuate control through trauma.
And yet, heroes persist as new ones rise.
Eisenhower problematized the complex; Kennedy reacted with sovereign audacity; Trump solves it through devolution and alliance.
And Putin? He's the bridge, the righteous resistor who turned opposition into orbit-building.
As we approach this unification, the psychospiritual shift is palpable.
9/11, once a divider becomes the fulcrum for healing—bipartisan as it implicates both parties' establishments; generational as millennials and zoomers inherit the quest for truth; East-West as Russia and America, long pitted as foes reveal and remember their shared Christian ethos against godless globalism.
The Sovereign Alliance's burden of peace, then, is the final inversion: from war's mandate to sovereignty's symphony.
Putin's 2003 stand against the western hegemon wasn't defeat, then; it was the seed of multipolarity. Trump's card plays it out, with 9/11 and other disclosures waiting in the wings as myriad aces.
In the War of Stories, awakening represents both the journey and the destination, the animating engine and the manifest end state as the narrative arc bends toward a unified, sovereign future.
To expand this tapestry, we must weave in the broader story of resistance, where each era's heroes build upon the last, creating a narrative mosaic that defies the Deep State's fragmentation.
From Eisenhower's solemn warning in 1961, painting the military-industrial complex as a threat to liberty itself to Kennedy's audacious American University speech in 1963, calling for peace with the Soviets as a shared human endeavor, the timeline pulses with moments of potential divergence.
Kennedy's vision was one of exploration—space races not as arms competitions, but as unifiers—mirrored in Trump's Artemis program and space force initiatives, which reposition America as a pioneer rather than a policeman. The Deep State interrupted this imperative with assassination, plunging the nation into Vietnam's abyss, a war that scarred a generation and set the stage for economic manipulations like the end of the gold standard under Nixon, whose own downfall via Watergate foreshadowed the lawfare against Trump.
Nixon's story, intertwined with Trump's through mentorship and shared enemies adds layers to this epic.
Trump, who corresponded with Nixon and drew inspiration from his comeback spirit, faced similar smears—impeachments, investigations—yet persevered, turning adversity into narrative fuel.
Reagan's chapter, with his "shining city on a hill" rhetoric, reignited the flame, dismantling the Berlin Wall not through war, but through economic pressure and moral clarity, much as Trump negotiates trade deals that weaken globalist dependencies.
And in the wake of a near reclamation of Americanism in the 1980s, JFK Jr.'s brief, but brilliant arc, with George magazine satirizing the elite while humanizing politics served as a bridge to the digital age, where alternative media now amplifies these truths.
His untimely death, shrouded in mystery echoes the family's curse while sparking the very sort of "what ifs" that fuel modern movements, imagining a world where Camelot's heir challenged the Clintons directly, and won out.
Or watched as future sovereigns took his revenge.
Putin's role in this global story cannot be understated; his post-9/11 pivot from cooperation to confrontation tells a tale of betrayal and resolve.
Initially offering an olive branch, the Russian stalwart watched as the U.S. weaponized terror for empire-building, invading Iraq despite his warnings of chaos. This betrayal, like Khrushchev's disillusionment after the U-2 incident hardened resolve, leading to interventions that preserved sovereignty in Syria and exposed ISIS as a Western proxy.
Trump's alignment, calling out the same deceptions crafts something much more than a buddy-cop narrative, then, but is representative of two outsiders uniting against a corrupt system, their backchannels a modern echo of Cold War hotlines.
The Sovereign Alliance emerges as the climax and crescendo, a coalition of the willing—BRICS nations rejecting dollar hegemony, Middle Eastern powers brokering peace—turning the unipolar script into a multipolar saga.
The psychospiritual dimension adds depth, portraying 9/11 not just as tragedy but as a collective trauma bond, a wound that, when lanced by truth releases healing energy.
All the while, the reborn, remade and rekindled Truth Community acts as the knife, cutting through layers of official narrative to reveal the engineered fear that has justified everything from surveillance states to endless wars.
Unification follows: families divided by politics finding common ground in shared deception; generations connecting through inherited quests for justice; East and West rediscovering fraternal bonds under shared values.
This catharsis isn't abstract; it's visceral, like awakening from a nightmare to find the monsters were illusions all along, empowering the dreamer to rewrite the story and scatter the darkness for good in the face of a lasting light.
And as the many chapters converge into the few, a series of Temporal Fulcrums stand as the pivots, where past horrors fuel future freedoms, the Deep State’s reign ultimately, inevitably yielding to sovereign resurgence.
Trump, Kennedy, Putin and those who came before them and who attempted to follow them—these are not isolated figures, but chapters unto themselves in an ongoing epic, where the bill of truth eventually comes due, and where awakening triumphs on the other side of it.
In other words, the War of Stories ends not with apocalypse, my friends, but apotheosis.
Until then … stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.
Author’s Note: THIS IS THE FINAL DAY in the campaign for Saving Seoul, a kick-ass Leatherbound Hardcover Novel by Burning Bright Publishing!
Click the image below to learn more about this LIMITED campaign, and consider backing the project to get a copy shipped straight to your door this fall.
Burning Bright’s goal is to provide a valuable resource for Truth, Discernment and Logic-Based Positivity, and all of my content is free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a Free or Paid Subscriber.
Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!
ALL members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.
‘Putin's pushback, then wasn't isolationist; it was prescient…’. He’s done that many times. I watched the Codex this week after (for several years now) having come to grips with the fact that, yes, we are the baddies! I’ve believed for several years now that the Nazis moved their ops to the US post WWII, Prussian-inspired (and goal) to create, take, Israel, etc.
In this light, I have to add my additional thoughts on 9/11. Sorry, it’s long. It is an excellent expose proving beyond a shadow of doubt that our own government, with cooperation from Israel, Saudi Arabia, etc., was planned and carried out by the military industrial complex, the intelligence agencies and the highest levels of our government to enter us into a surveillance state, to generate endless profits via a forever war against a vaguely defined terror threat, to begin the end of the destruction of our constitutional republic. Many don’t realize that the Bush family was in business with the binLadin family’s construction business for years prior to this, that their partnership also included projects in Yemen. This is just one of the connections not revealed in this expose.
Once over the shock of ‘watching’ the second tower ‘hit’ I started questioning. My initial thought was controlled demolition, as I watched one years before. The non-coincidences of the $2.3 trillion unaccounted DoD funds, the Silverstein anomaly, the implosion of tower 7 and the impacts to responses and investigations that caused….on and on, including Barbara Olson’s death. She was spot on in her investigations into the Clinton’s. The exercises planned in advance, Biden writing and failing to pass the Patriot Act in 1994; the coincidences are virtually endless, including the corporations and entities that have profited from the event.
Brad’s vast engineering knowledge and of Manhattan, in particular, give him credibility in each of his assertions and, again, I believe he’s provided the ‘smoking gun’ of our government’s guilt in this massive false flag. All of the CIA’s operations, Claudio, Northwood, etc., again on and on…
What I have to consider is the rest of the story. I thought of this about 10 minutes into this film. First, if the towers were imploded (as I now consider 1, 2, & 7 were), then evidence of this treason would still exist. (Completely opposite the CIA planted backpack with the high jackers’ plans, and the clean, undamaged passports), Their would be more bodies, there would be way more steel sheeting, the debris pile would be massive and much within it would be identifiable if the building just pancaked. Demolition causes dust clouds, as I observed, and Brad included in his film, BUT, it does not turn steel, and everything else completely into dust….literally dust. Massive clouds of pulverized dust.
Having read Dr. Judy Wood’s Where Did the Towers Go? (twice), I consider that what she describes in her assessment was done to completely obliterate the evidence of treason and mass murder. The technology to do this level of molecular destruction is observed throughout the crime scene, but not specifically named, other than referencing the Hutchinson Effect. This technology is exactly what the cabal and their minions don’t want us to know about, yet here analysis clearly demonstrates the effects. So, other than severely limiting evidence of treason and speeding up debris removal, what else might be happening? I believe President (traitor) Lyndon B. Johnson was speaking the truth when he told us in the late 60s that whomever controls the world’s weather, controls the world. I consider these lasers (or whatever technology was used) can be used to affect weather. Three HAARP locations are strategically located around the globe. vs only the first one in Alaska I used to watch via their cam before they stopped access. When one considers the anomalies of how the (then) Hurricane Erin, behaved just prior and just after the ‘hits’, it seems reasonable the some type of unknown/hidden technology was used to maneuver it into the perfect position for the false flag operation. Recent hurricanes and other weather anomalies reinforce my observations about the capabilities.
In Where Did the Towers Go, the pictures of the entire site clearly shows evidence of guided technology wherein there are areas of minor damage, with a clean demarcation of total (focused) obliteration….with tiny amounts of debris considering the total mass of all the buildings. Only certain buildings were attacked. The basement design keeping out the water survived completely intact. This is not coincidence, either, and who benefited in more profits by not having to completely replace the ‘bathtub’?
So, I believe the intricate planning and detailing of the controlled demolition/implosion process is clearly described and proven by Brad’s film. I also believe the weaponized technology Dr. Wood’s investigation has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Bottom line. Both of these investigations can be, and very likely are, true. If you watched this film, you must get Dr. Judy Wood’s book, Where Did the Towers Go? Together, they lay out the purpose for, the planning of, actual execution of and the acts of covering up evidence of the most massive and egregious false flag operation against our nation. By the enemies within.
Food for thought anyway.
Excellent! The psychospiritual shift really is palpable, seems to be getting stronger daily. (at least in my psyche). It is an odd phenomenon, generating hope while eliciting a vague uneasiness about what could or couldn't happen in the coming months. It's a great story though; wouldn't miss it for the world.