Panic Pattern

[Their] Threat is Our Promise

“My retribution is going to be success.”

That was the key line for me to emerge from the first (and possibly last?) presidential debate of the 2024 election cycle, because it managed to be both political and cultural, actual and narrative, inverting establishment branding while simultaneously donning it like a badge of honor.

In short, it represented a shift many of us have felt, and made in our own lives and in our own deployments and postures in the Info War that doubles as a Culture War, one from defense to offense, reaction to action, endurance to initiative.

It summed up both the presence of Donald Trump and the presence of this movement—of our movement—at this crucial inflection point in American history, and as I said on the night, this debate was about presence, not policy.

And, to be honest, it exceeded even my wildest fever dreams regarding the disparate demeanors on display. And I focus on demeanors for a reason.

Keep in mind, while the Truth Community is orders of magnitude larger than it was pre-Trump & pre-Q, we still exist in an informational bubble within a bubble, which is largely defined by being further along an informational timeline than our fellows, even within the MAGA normiesphere.

Extend that out to the Normie Layers of the Collective Mind watching Joe Biden fumble his way through the barely-maintained ability to form sentences, nevermind coherent thoughts while Donald Trump was seen considering his opponent, considering the questions and considering his answers.

None of this approaches the intricacies of policy, geopolitics or game theory, because we weren’t the audience for this debate.

This debate was and is a binary. The American people are being asked how they feel about the state of the country, and about the state of its leadership.

How do you think they felt watching a slack-jawed Biden cringing his way through 90 mins of forced humiliation?

And yet, the Watchmen have ever and always been the parties to watch in the winding ways of a war based on and defined by information control.

So then, what was the temperature of the narrative-setters themselves as they watched their carefully-erected web of lies come crashing down in tune with the shudders and shivers of the political corpse they housed it in?

From ZeroHedge:

According to CNN’s John King, there will now be a mad last minute scramble to force Biden off the ticket.

King said there was “A deep, a wide, and a very aggressive panic in the Democratic Party, it started minutes into the debate and it continues right now.”

“It involves party strategists, it involves elected officials, it involves fundraisers. And they’re having conversations about the president’s performance which they think was dismal, which they think will hurt other people down the party in the ticket and they’re having conversations about what they should do about it,” he added.

“Some of those conversations include should we go to the White House and ask the president to step aside, other conversations are about should prominent Democrats go public with that call because they feel this debate was so terrible,” said King.

Democrat political analyst Van Jones also suggested that Biden’s awful night should mean he’s replaced before the convention.

“He had a test tonight to restore the confidence of the country and of the base and he failed to do that,” said Jones.

In other words, the temperature was one of panic … a word they’re not only using freely in the immediate aftermath of the latest in the establishment’s Crisis Cascade, but codifying into the story as an anchor.

To wit …

"Biden looks like the caricature that conservative media has been painting ... you saw it before your eyes!"

Chuck Todd has been one of the regime’s staunchest defenders, but there’s significant signal in his statement, as the debate didn’t expose Joe Biden, but rather the very establishment Todd and the psycho(analysts) in the media machine represent … while simultaneously revealing the underlying truth this community has been built on—and demonized because of—ever since Trump came down that golden escalator.

And if TIME and the TV talking heads that largely built careers of falsity off Trump’s name in the first place aren’t enough for you, observe twin deployments out of the key narrative-setter of the western world.

The New York Times did not mince words, but seems prepared to mince someone …

Hell, the editorial that made the most waves over the weekend was draped in the colors of the Gray Lady herself:

Beautifully, almost hauntingly surreal, isn’t it?

The debate is a bicameral reveal, as the exposure of lies doesn’t just wipe them away, but unearths the underlying truth they were manufactured to bury in the first place.

Why? How?

It wasn’t the substance. It was about the demeanor. The presence.

The pincer of Donald Trump AND … yes, Joe Biden, who is their candidate in name only … and if you think that’s crazy, they’re starting to put the pieces together.

At the beginning of the year, I said the longer Joe Biden remained the Democratic candidate for president, the more proof we had of patriot control/devolution.

In other words, they're not afraid that they might have to replace Joe Biden. They're afraid that they might not be able to replace him.

What you're seeing in the immediate aftermath of 'the debate' is the media machine coming to this realization in real time, though the smarter cretins were front-running the panic pattern well in advance.

The system is caught in a series of pincers.

If they CAN and DO replace him, they're mortgaging whatever public mandate they have left after having propped him up as an establishment corpse while tearing down his opposition (meaning us.)

As for how they’d do this, while it was at first obvious that the Biden team wasn’t playing ball, prompting me to grant a bit more side-eye to the Old Yeller template, the most recent reports have conflated Biden’s personal sunsetting with a voluntary transference of the concept to his campaign, allowing for the machine to maintain plausible deniability (albeit heavily curtailed in an age of acceleration, decentralization and exposure,) and sympathy farming.

If they can't replace Joe Biden ... they're going to have to roll over, or roll out a redux of the 2020 election steal in a mass psychological environment significantly more hostile and, more so, AWARE of them than ever before.

My friend

Chris Paul

had a similar reading …

And Chris also posted an excerpt from one of the key narrative-setters of the establishment, The Atlantic, putting their own if-then proposition into the ether that quite mirrors ours:

“What exactly happens if Biden drops out? Well, there are two options. Either he drops out and endorses another candidate, or he allows the party to decide at the convention. Ideally, he would do the latter, to allow a competitive process to determine his successor as the Democratic nominee.

Either way, I have no illusions that any of this would be orderly. Speeding through a nominating process in a month and a half because the incumbent has decided he’s incapable of victory is going to be chaotic, and the Democrats could end up with a candidate with serious vulnerabilities.

But as Biden showed last night, the party most certainly has a flawed candidate now. The Democrats need to be able to find a nominee who’s actually able to mount a vigorous challenge to Trump and the singular threat he poses to American democracy.”

As for which scenario I personally lean toward?

As I’ve said many times before, I believe they’re stuck with him, in more ways than one. And I think those in the know understand this, or at least fear it. My friends and peers

Jon Herold

and

Just Human

have long argued along the same lines.

And we’re not the only ones …

Of course, this prediction might also betray my underlying desire to see this Wolf of Wall Street scene play out with Joe Biden in place of Leonardo DiCaprio’s Jordan Belfort:

(And no … I’m not joking.)

That said, it is unwise to get married to one outcome in a war based on the obfuscation, corruption and dissemination of information—of narrative—itself, and my friend

JuliansRum

has his own read on where things are going next, which has only taken on more gravity in the wake of the Biden family’s supposed slow capitulation to the mob:

While the Deep State being unable to replace Joe Biden would act as a major Devo proof while being hilarious (for us,) the only thing even MORE representative of an Establishment Corruption ticket would include the names Obama AND/OR Clinton.

It would also represent a directional Q proof (as if we needed any more of them,) while, as JR says above, bringing us full-circle in the War of Stories that kicked off in 2016.

The best stories have catharsis at their hearts, and the only way to achieve catharsis is through resolution of the primary conflict, often through its primary characters.

Donald Trump is the primary character representing the reader (that's us.) Will Joe Biden remain the primary character representing [them?]

Time will tell, but the original names in the Info War, the Clintons, Obamas and all the rest are not done … it only remains to be seen how they resurface, and how long after that they are ultimately drowned in the depths of a traumatized American psyche for good.

All of which is to say, it matters far less WHAT the establishment does in the wake of Joe Biden's disastrous debate performance, and far more that the Collective Mind sees them doing it.

Either way, these are desperate times in the cabal, and, at least narratively, there’s been a bifurcation in the Establishment, one not even they seem consciously aware of, yet.

The Old Guard—either by hook or, more likely, by crook—know what fate ultimately awaits them, just as they know that the very panic pattern their underlings, sycophants and former bishops and jesters are currently effecting is affecting so much more than they could ever develop the foresight to understand. Because foresight requires wisdom, and wisdom begets poise, something Donald Trump displayed in spades on Thursday night.

As another infamous jester, Heath Ledger’s Joker famously said in The Dark Knight, “When the chips are down, these people … they’ll eat each other.”

And I would argue, watching that play out is itself the point. The Crisis is the Story. The Establishment is on parade … and some people think this is still about an election.

If you haven’t been able to get the Game Theory that’s playing out calcified into your mind’s eye, I hope the current situation put it in perspective. The enemy has a choice. They’ve always had a choice. It’s just never been one that results in them winning.

Essentially, they’ve been granted a series of choices all the way down the chain to their own destruction, choosing the manner and persuasion of their own metaphorical and systemic death—including the face that system wears at any given time—and that of their diseased, corrupt temple and all its priests, their panic provoking escalation, and that escalation resulting in exposure, which is to say, sunlight, the thing most anathema to creatures of the dark.

Awakening comes in many forms ... as does control, which puts “Death of the D Party” framing in new context.

And yet, it’s not just about the D party, it’s about the Watchmen themselves, which might explain why their panic is tinged with some acidic vitriol. They threw in with him, which means they go down with him … whether they replace him or not.

And they know it.

Ruminating on this, marinating in it allows me the opportunity to resurface one of my favorite analogues to the Trump trap … which can just as easily be applied to Dementia Joe:

“None of you seem to understand. I’m not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with me.”

The statement—the promise—is made by Rorschach in an infamous scene in the Watchmen graphic novel, when he’s thrown in—literally—to the maximum security general population, home to many of the most vicious and psychopathic criminals he himself is responsible for putting there in the first place.

… and isn’t it incredible (planned, some might say,) that you could apply that same statement, that same analogue to either Biden or Trump? The Bicameral, Paradoxical Awakening Presidents?

If we return to the framing of the debate in the lead-up, the Watchmen largely focused on the arena, or the battlefield, and the regime’s prepping of it, replete with muted mics and biased moderators, all of which gave the impression to an increasing plurality of the American public of a canned hunt, and that’s coming on the heels of a very real (even if necessary) Witch Hunt that still has yet to reach its ultimate crescendo in the War of Stories.

And of course, the canned hunt lead-up, along with the panicked aftermath begs the question: why fear this man so much? Why not admit (temporary defeat?)

After all, the regime and its defenders have survived like all creatures of the dark do … by burrowing, by hiding, by scratching a living out off subterranean river and rock. Creatures of the dark have always feared the light, we know, but they seem to believe this light isn’t quite as temporary as it’s been in the past.

Returning to the lede, secondary to the narrative posture of the Establishment in the lead-in, and dominating it in the aftermath, the countenance of the gladiators that take the field often goes further with the audience than their actual performance—the substance of the man is often more memorable and immediately discernible than the substance of the fight.

In short, what was the energy on display, from both men?

Trump’s, I would argue, was calm, cool, collected … and humorous. Charming, even.

Biden’s … didn’t exist.

The story was defined by something lacking, something lost rather than something found. And yet, as we’ve seen by the continued media and establishment fallout, this wasn’t a lack that recalls a blank canvas onto which the system can paint whatever story it wants. Instead, it recalls a dried-out husk, the thin, eggshell veneer barely laid over the crumbling, grotesque visage of the many-eyed beast that wore it up to now.

As for Subject matter—rather, what was SUPPOSED to be the subject matter, as projected by the very establishment currently devouring the candidate they offered up in the first place: the Biden team focused on the projected evils of Trump’s ‘Project 2025’ in the lead-up, something the puppet himself seemed to forget—along with everything else—when the moment finally arrived.

But … what IS Project 2025?

In short, it’s something that’s as popular to the American people as it is anathema to the political establishment, as witnessed by the drubbing the Biden Campaign (again, OURS) took when an attempt to fear-monger over said campaign ended up coming off more like an endorsement of it:

In short, Project 2025 is branding … projected by the one side and embraced by the other.

Because of how snugly the proposed policy philosophy by the Heritage Foundation matches up with the desires of the MAGA base, one can struggle to recall that it was not actually developed by the Trump campaign, though it undoubtedly runs in parallel with its own Agenda 47, which is the ‘official’ brand of Trump 2024.

So then, in a way, Project 2025 is acting as both a Narrative Shield to draw enemy fire AND a barometer through which to gauge the public buy-in to the neutering of the Administrative State, and yes, the Federal Government that propped it up on marionette strings in the first place … a process that accelerated this week with a pair of Supreme Court decisions otherwise lost in the noise of debates and arguments over immunity.

First up, from Axios on Thursday:

"In a potentially groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that defendants accused of fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission have the right to a jury trial."

Next up, from CBS on Friday:

"The Supreme Court on Friday overturned a landmark 40-year-old decision that gave federal agencies broad regulatory power, upending their authority to issue regulations unless Congress has spoken clearly."

Essentially, while the Collective Mind was sleeping, we were absolutely kicking ass on the Actual layers of the Info War, with the administrative state getting neutered to close out the week.

What's particularly satisfying to me is the fact that you can take this thread by SLATE commie Mark Joseph Stern whining about the decision and repurpose it as your own argument.

No lies detected. Lots of panic, though.

Or, put another way … winning is all around us, if you cultivate the eyes to see it.

And so, amidst the continued and accelerating fallout of Supreme Court decisions on the powers of the federal government and its chief executive, an enormously contentious election cycle, polling momentum, policy proposals and a rapid shift in American demographics (and not in the establishment’s favor, contrary to popular belief and mongering) … it all comes up lacking in drama and intrigue commiserate with the present moment, and ultimately rings out less hollow than discordant against the bizarre fever dream the American political and institutional landscape has become to the Normie Layers of the Collective Mind.

Or did you forget that this all takes place in the foreground of the prospective jailing of a presidential candidate (and former president) for the first time in American history, potentially set to take place in the month on the calendar most synonymous with the founding and remembrance of the very Republic we hope to usher in anew, or else restore to its former glory?

The prospect—the inevitability—of such a supposedly nonlinear and yet, highly predictable plot point reminds us that the Info War has many names, and admittedly, I use one of my favorites least often: the Strange War.

And yet, when you know the way broadly, you can see it in all things.

The System is threatening to jail Trump, which is the ultimate corporeal manifestation of them locking up our ideology, our sovereignty … our hope.

Steve Bannon signaling this boldly and calmly is not a signal to them, but to us; it’s a Bicameral signal, one meant to set expectations while also assuaging fears, which follows Trump’s speech pattern of laying out the problems and guiding the reactions, while also seeding solutions.

It's Hegelian, just like the Deep State’s dialectic we’ve been trapped in for generations.

All of which is to say … I’m not worried.

I can’t quite say the same thing for the other guys.

Or did you so quickly forget that, while Joe Biden was wandering around like a dementia patient at the G-7 meeting, his supposed allies in the Globalist Regime were attempting to wring more out of him than the typical meandering sound bites reserved for his corporate media handlers, specifically regarding commitments to Ukraine funding and overall support for the NATO bloc?

That is encouraging in and of itself, as it’s further evidence of the Deep State Archipelago concept I’ve been talking about for some time, in which it’s becoming apparent that formerly-connected nodes within the Deep State’s matrix have been cut off from their former communications and control structures.

What’s more … it’s a MAJOR Devolution proof.

The fact that EU ‘Allies’ are taking Biden to task for not holding up his end of the bargain implies that the net effects of a regime candidate ‘winning’ the 2020 election have not come to pass.

Now why would that be?

We’ve been told we’re watching a movie. Anons have believed it for some time, but each and every day, with each and every POTATUS deployment, I’d like to think another swamp creature starts to believe it, too.

We’ve been told we’re going to like how this movie ends. I’m not so sure I’d say the same about the other guys.

And so, I don’t assume we’re going to win because I’m naïve … I do because reverse engineering that eventuality maps onto the enemy’s panic pattern and the patriot’s progress projection we’re seeing most accurately.

To wit, the establishment on both sides of the Atlantic have now been trapped in the unenviable position of running on Fear as a platform, no matter which Globalist, Prussian-trained Regime candidate they trot out in front of the diseased and crumbling, rolling engine of death and decay that hath become them.

Do you think this was by design? Let me rephrase: do you think this was by THEIR design?

It all takes me back to my own storytelling roots, an my obsession with active vs. passive writing, which is to say, initiative.

Initiative is everything in war.

Whether you're talking about a kinetic, large-scale conflict spanning battlefields, one-on-one combat or informational warfare, controlling the battlespace itself is largely dependent on which side holds the initiative, which is to say, which side acts, and which side RE-acts.

One common misconception regarding initiative, which I often discuss in the context of combat sports, is that the side that "moves first" or "acts first" is the side that holds initiative. Only, that doesn't work when it comes to counter-strikers, who are widely considered to be the most effective athletes in the fight game.

Outward appearances aside, counter-strikers absolutely enforce initiative; they do so by provoking enemy actions, which are by definition transformed into RE-actions.

In other words, the most effective means of countering an enemy is to convince him that HE is the one making decisions, when you are making them FOR him.

So. Who seems in control to you?

[Them] ... or us?

And if not them, why not?

Well, for starters … they seem to be going backwards in the timeline, which means they know they’ve missed something. Something they should have caught before. Something some of us did catch.

That’s not initiative, folks … that’s called chasing ghosts, and “The Donald” is a ghost that’s been haunting them for far longer than they knew up to now.

Observe that the Atlantic thinks they're exceedingly clever with the framing of this deep dive on The Apprentice as a "character" study (in more ways than one) leading up to the election.

In a manner of speaking, they ARE clever, compared to the other establishment vultures in the media industrial complex.

The thing is, the fact that "The Donald" was a persona crafted, perfected or launched on The Apprentice isn't lost on most Anons. We've been saying it for years.

What's actually bothering the establishment about this revelation is that it's just dawning on them, and they're just beginning to connect the dots with the benefit of hindsight ... which is now changing to foresight.

"The Donald" is famous as a construct for being tough, fair, bombastic ... and exceedingly direct. He would laugh in one scene and "fire" contestants in the next without so much as a twitch.

What happens when this "character" knows EXACTLY who's loyal to him ... and who's not?

We discussed this slow-dawning revelation on a recent episode of Defected:

… which might go a long way toward explaining why the machine only breaks long enough from covering “The Donald” to pen headlines like this:

Donald Trump is a character. A symbol. A cypher. And one they can’t seem to shake.

Characters act as animating engines for stories, which deliver core truths.

So, what are the Actuals of the Agenda 47 branding, which is another word for the Story this character is acting as the animating engine of?

What signal was actually going on in between Trump’s memetic rhetoric?

Aside from meeting with American Bitcoin miners, going to narrative war with the central bankers and discussing national defense in the form of decentralization and energy as forms of asymmetric power projection, how about floating the idea of abolishing income taxes?

It's a genuinely incredible pincer move.

Typically, the commie counter against threats to end taxation is something along the lines of "muh roads."

If you have two brain cells to rub together to make a third, you'll already know that's an argument put together by Prussians (literally,) meant to cow you into the belief that we need the government to steal from us in order to build the very infrastructure a free market would already very obviously put together in order to transact, live and thrive free of intervention.

BUT ... we wouldn't be in an Info War if the logical answer was the way to counter decades of engineered propaganda and systematized control.

Here, Trump is proposing to eliminate taxation WITHOUT threatening "muh roads," as funding will still be plentiful in the form of that globalist trade commies are always carrying on about.

Surely they can't argue that taxes levied on voluntary foreign trade partners are immoral, when taxes on Americans are moral?

Beautiful.

And my friend

Chris Paul

put his own spin on the deployment, which I don’t see as a beta test so much as a threat and a promise all rolled into one—a signal flare, if you will:

And what is that embattled Supreme Court that Donald Trump completely reformed in his/our image during his first go-round up to?

Dismantling the administrative state, curtailing Federal authority, and bringing CHOICE back to the American people.

So, if ‘The Master’ series I’ve slowly been expanding is all about Trump’s fighting style and how it’s working … what is he fighting for? What are we fighting for?

Decentralization of the financial system, decentralized energy as national defense, outsourcing income tax, and the resurgence of sovereignty as the core, radiant engine of the individual on the Micro, and the Republic on the Macro.

The little things.

All the American people really need to know is that, by the System’s own admission, that Agenda is anathema to their own. That’s a good start, and for many, it may as well be a cognitive end, which brings up the stance I’ve long argued that posits that in a Mind War, you don’t need enemy psychological combatants to adopt your paradigm in order to destabilize the old one.

This is a reversal of the enemy’s subversion, only we’re using the truth to subvert, so we’re replacing the false with the real, rather than the inverse.

This is key to understanding just why the Awakening process is taking a relatively short period of time, measured in years, while the enemy’s complex and contradictory web of obfuscation and subversion has taken generations … some would say centuries, not to mention wars, which might give you a hint as to why Wars are so necessary for the machine in the first place, not just economically and militarily … but historically.

After all, history is nothing if not the shared story we tell our youth about our world, and their place in it.

And for a false story to win, you must occasionally purge minds that question its legitimacy and its veracity.

They’re not getting their needed war this time. Which is why “they never thought she would lose” was as much a threat as a promise.

So, again, taken against the backdrop of the current persuasion of the Info War, the Deep State is on the verge of imprisoning Donald Trump … and yet:

• The Media establishment can’t decide which of their puppets should replace Biden, which is secondary to the concern over whether or not whichever puppet they choose CAN replace Biden

• Julian Assange has been released, who kicked off the very informational cascade that essentially cost Hillary Clinton the 2016 election

• The Supreme Court is about to set potentially catastrophic precedents defining presidential immunity and power that will hem in Deep State criminals for the trials to come

• BRICS and the international Sovereign Alliance has never been stronger, while Globalism hangs by a thread

• The FED is caught in a stagflationary pincer

They stole the 2020 election. They indicted him. They convicted him.

They're going to jail him.

AND ... they're going to try to steal it again, either via fraud or their own inverted version of Continuity of Government, as Kash Patel recently signaled ... which is why you're seeing "foreign interference" and "muh Russia, muh China" coming back into the central narrative like a plague.

Asymmetric warfare is the name of the Game Theory, and nonlinear events are the only moves remaining for the Finite Player.

And yet ... Anons are comfy, because we were told, directionally that all of the above was going to happen, and because we've now observed the capital WHY. Not from [their] side. But from ours.

We discussed this in my most popular feature to date, which I recommend reading if you’re either new to or somehow averse to the Q Op—an operation that will go down as the most influential and beneficial information dissemination program in modern history when all is said and done.

---

---

So. Do [they] feel in charge right now?

The story of Trump is the story of us, and if you're paying attention to Narrative Structure, you might begin to see why so many of us believe we're going to like how it ends.

The war isn't linear. The story is.

"Sometimes, you must walk through the darkness before you see the light."

As we’ve argued many times, Donald Trump is not THE threat; we are. He’s just the one representing us, which is why all their slings and arrows have been directed his way, and why he’s never been more powerful as a character, as a cypher and as a symbol than he is right now.

Ultimately, what they fear is that the end goal of Agenda 47 is also its starting point: peace. And they fear there might be a narrow path pointing in that very direction.

The framing of this report—and so many like it—suggests Donald Trump doesn't know exactly how and when peace between Ukraine and Russia is going to occur, which is a fantasy.

That said, it's pretty funny to see the establishment getting ahold of Trump's proposed peace plan without recognizing immediately that it's a DIRECT MIRROR to Vladimir Putin's peace plan that Ukraine (and its Globalist handlers) have reportedly rejected at every turn.

Putin's stated goals for piece with Kiev include the denazification of the Donbas (done,) the annexation of the Donbas into the Russian Federation (basically done,) and a commitment from Kiev that Ukraine will not seek to join NATO.

The latter point may seem like the ONLY point of contention remaining where it concerns Trump and the sovereign, America First version of the United States ... and yet, even THAT is not a contradiction, as Trump has publicly forwarded his desire for the US to withdraw from NATO as well.

The deal is already made. The rest is awakening.

But the regime aren’t the only ones setting narratives about the Peace President. Some of his current and former allies are in the mix, as well, including Robert C. O’Brien …

We're in a War of Stories, and as that story accelerates toward a series of mass psychological inflection points, it seems patriots are trying to lend a helping hand to Americans who aren't quite picking up the themes on a quick enough timeline.

In other words, we’ve reached the assisted reading point of the narrative.

Moves and counter moves. Signals and flares.

The ultimate irony is that, what the Deep State fears most is the ending of the perpetual engine of war they have layered over our reality as an inevitability, a fact of life and the horror of the human condition … when the wiles of man do NOT trend in that direction absent a push.

For too long, we have spoken of Peace as the absence of war … when in reality, it is the antithesis of war.

Peace must be actively pursued, rather than brought about as a product or side effect.

After all, as I said in what remains my personal favorite feature on this publication, “Peace will be the death of war,” which is why the Deep State doesn’t fear it … they fear those with the strength and foresight to bring it about.

This is the end game that marks the ultimate subversion of their end goal—a perpetual period of peace and productivity that stands as both the reward in place of and the bulwark against its opposite. The rest is a story—a series of them—we’re being told, shown and yes, actively participating in on the way there.

So, as you continue to watch an Establishment System turn in on the very Establishment Regime they propped up in the first place, worry less on any number of spider-webbed outcomes or Actual strands and pathways the story charts en route to its inevitable destination, and ruminate more so on the fact that the web itself is currently illuminated, along with all the many-legged, many-fanged things that made the spaces between lies their shifting, shadowed homes, now blinded and burned out.

The dark fears the light. Always has. Always will.

And we’re the ones holding the torches.

[Their] threat is OUR promise. And we’re going to make good on it.

Until next time, stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.

---

Burning Bright’s goal is to provide a valuable resource for Truth, Discernment and Logic-Based Positivity, and all of my content is free. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a Free or Paid Subscriber.

Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!

ALL members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.