Bright Brief - Ghosts of Justice
Bright Brief - Ghosts of Justice
Exploring the Civilian-Military Alliance
(As with all theories I present on Burning Bright, the following interpretation of past, ongoing and future events should be read with Bicameral Thinking applied.)
Narratives are at the heart of everything we explore at Burning Bright. But then, I need not remind this audience of that fact.
That said, some narratives exist almost exclusively in the realm of the Potential, while others see their foundations set in the Actual. The debate between this Potential and Actual distinction can and has spilled over into the larger Truth community of late, with Anons, citizen journalists and truthers arguing about everything from public-facing comments of former—or still current—Trump allies and those some would paint as enemies, traitors or snakes in the grass.
I have already explored my thoughts on this trend in recent Briefs, including Tuesday’s Hot Potato, so if you’d like a more direct reading as to my thoughts on kayfabe and playing to the Narrative, that’s a good piece to check out.
Today, however, I’d like to explore the beginnings of a thought that lodged itself in my mind while watching a recent episode of the Devolution Power Hour with Patel Patriot, Patrick Gunnels and Just Human, during which communications from and between former DOJ leaders were at the heart of a scintillating conversation.
I believe Patel is onto this angle in a deep dive, Micro way only he can be, and I ended up having a private conversation with Just Human regarding it following the episode.
In short, the nagging question that has latched itself into my psyche of late is the following:
What if the Civilian-Military Alliance many of us believe was actioned or codified with the launch of the Trump Admin and, more directly the launch of the public intel dissemination program known as the ‘Q Operation’ is a bit more overt than we have considered up until now? What if the ‘Civilian’ term in said alliance goes beyond us, and also includes members of the Trump Admin itself?
In fact, what if ‘Civilian’ powers wielded by Trump officials are what will ultimately bring down the Deep State, or at least contribute more directly to that corrupt apparatus’ decline than some of us have believed up until now?
On its face, the prospect seems nonsensical. After all, wasn’t the point of installing Trump into office—both by us and, if some theories are to be believed—an alliance of patriotic Military Intel assets—specifically to wield the levers of power in the U.S. Government against the cabal? If so, what use would these elected ‘white hats’ have of relying on civilian powers?
My percolating theory isn’t so much revolutionary as it is practical. No doubt the U.S. Government and its requisite positions wield more overt power than any civilian position—official or otherwise—could. That said, most of our discussions in this little corner of the Truth community concern the Narrative War at work overlaying and underlying the tactical war that has been ‘hot’ since 2016 at the latest. We all understand the importance of compartmentalization, segmentation and obfuscation in such a tactical environment, do we not?
We also understand how compromised most institutions—especially those of the ‘justice’ variety—in our government have become over the generations. In short, if we are right about said institutional corruption, from the DOJ to the DOD to the intel agencies to Congressional oversight, wouldn’t it make sense to shield patriotic counter-ops from such corruption as much as possible?
Part of what kicked off this particular mental rabbit hole was General Flynn’s recent comments presenting the aforementioned ‘Q Op’ as a disinfo campaign, something that I believe has been completely misconstrued. In fact, I believe Flynn was giving somewhat open endorsement of the Op, drawing attention to it and even showing support for it, lending further credence to the idea that the Op has been designed to engage a Civilian arm of decentralized intelligence patriots have been wielding—or at least, guiding—against our collective enemies since late 2017.
I believe Flynn drew attention to a theme that seems to underlie many of the digs and theories Anons have had for years, largely kicked off by observation and dissection of the Q drops along with continued observation and dissection of Trump Admin officials, appointments and their roles both during and following the public-facing Admin as various investigations, scandals and narratives continue to play out in both mainstream and alternative media circles.
The key moment in the Flynn interview that sticks out to me is his reference of the Q Op as “ultra government,” something that could exist outside of the purview of the traditional U.S. governmental structure. On its face, this isn’t revolutionary or shocking news to most of you, but in connecting this concept to the Macro theory of the Q Op being just ONE example of a larger Civilian-Military Alliance could clue us in as to the overarching and underlying war strategy employed by the Trump Admin and its foundational engineers.
Zooming out, it’s long been accepted in this community that the Q Op is or was a civilian intel operation. A triggering dissemination program meant to seed a larger-scale and longer-term awakening. In this regard, I believe the Op has been incredibly successful. After all, I’m sure many of you reading these words today were activated by this Op.
Collectively, you represent an engaged and psychologically (never actually) weaponized, decentralized intel arm of the Trump Admin, serving to both expose Deep State actors and operations while helping to disseminate information to the masses, effectively bypassing the Media Industrial Complex.
That said, something I have been considering lately is the possibility that the means through which the Trump team itself—and whatever MIL Intel it has at its disposal or, more likely its foundation—has been engaging the Deep State on a legal and administrative level has been staring us in the face for some time.
One of the running jokes and criticisms of the Trump Admin while in office has been the continued, seemingly ubiquitous tension with his own current and former appointees, from public spats with his said officials to firings, releasings, resignations and the ensuing ‘public scandals’ of folks many of us still consider to be Trump-allied patriots of the highest order, from Flynn himself to Steve Bannon, Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Mike Pence and on and on.
We have discussed the optical reasons for these departures many times, from Narrative Separation and the continued deployment of ‘Fog of War’ obfuscation, but I’d like to touch on a more practical theory regarding the game of Musical Chairs the Trump DOJ and DOD became in the early and waning days of his Admin, from Christopher Miller and Ezra Cohen-Watnick to John Huber, Michael Horowitz and the aforementioned Trump-adjacent names whose only agreement this community can seem to come to regarding is a mutual non-agreement stalemate.
(IE: Exactly the point. But I digress.)
Most of us hold as a somewhat foundational belief the prospect that the Deep State has and possibly continues to hold great sway within the halls of the U.S. Government. Some of us even believe the current, ‘Acting’ Admin is more of a puppet show (on either side,) than others, but the fact remains that large swaths of the DOJ, DOD and specifically the intel agencies have been weaponized against the American people. Thus, it stands to reason that Trump installing a few new managers of these institutions would not automatically be enough to purge them of corruption overnight.
Enter the ‘Deputized Civilian’ aspect of the ongoing war.
What if the civilian arm of the Trump Admin isn’t only focusing on Anons? What if Trump’s appointees are Ghosts in the Machine, appointed to governmental positions only long enough to get in, action specific objectives, expose specific modes of corruption and use the considerable might of U.S. Administrative and Constitutional powers to gather evidence before phasing back out, only to continue investigations and patriotic duties on the civilian side?
From Ezra Cohen-Watnick floating in and out of Oracle, one of the most powerful and long-standing software companies in the world, to Christopher C. Miller, Kash Patel and other DOD appointments floating in and out of DOD and likely kicking off Devolution protocols in the waning days of the Administration, to storytellers and narrative-setters like Bannon sliding out of the ‘official’ War Rooms and into civilian-facing comms bunkers, to Flynn acting as a scandal magnet while serving as one of the great morale leaders among the aforementioned decentralized civilian intelligence network, all the while his brother serves as the current Commanding General of the U.S. Army Pacific, many of Trump’s appointees seem to do their best and most active work AFTER their ‘official’ duties have been completed.
Thus, I’ll wrap up my theory in Socratic manner:
Where’s Huber?
Are the folks who have ‘handed off’ investigations speaking in a mirrored dialect?
What if the hand-offs are not so much occurring on the way OUT … but on the way IN?
I thought of opening with the proposed general mechanism through which this Civilian-Military Alliance has functioned within and without the public-facing Trump Admin, but I’ll close with it instead.
This was the theory as presented on Truth Social a few nights ago:
Percolating theory on how far the civilian-military alliance inherent in Devolution goes:
I believe we often focus on Trump's cabinet and sub-cabinet appointments and stints in official government positions, and sometimes assume that, when they "stepped down" or were replaced, their job was done.
What if their job was only just beginning?
What if, by returning to "civilian, private" roles, they could put everything they learned in governmental positions to use, and "start" their investigations?
This general reading of the game of musical chairs we saw during the Trump Admin in the DOJ and DOD could be explained by the following strategy:
Get in, root out as much Government corruption as possible. Collect evidence using Government powers = Full power of DOJ/DOD.
"Step down," or be "replaced," return to private sector, kick off civilian investigations using what was gathered.
New appointee/replacement repeats Step 1.
Civilians brought back during trials as expert witnesses.
Some reasons for this "hand-off" strategy:
Shields "outgoing" DOJ/DOD leaders and their real investigations from compromised Congressional, Agency and Government scrutiny.
Ensures fresh eyes with specific expertise are rotated in to action specific Ops and gather specific evidence.
Gives the Trump Admin and allies the outward appearance of being chaotic, uncontrolled/scrambling.
The nature of step-downs/departures obfuscates the current standing of said leaders with Trump.
A few anecdotes that point to some version of the above:
Trump saying "we had to go around them. And we went around them like no one's gone around them in history."
If Government institutions are compromised, how do you bring justice?
In line with the Constitution. If a Government betrays its people, citizens/civilians have the duty/power to abolish it.
Fits in perfectly with the self-described National Security-adjacent Q Operation, which will never be officially acknowledged.
In summation:
Many of us read the "civilian-military" alliance as being a reference to Anons. To us. An energized subset of the population responsible for exposing/digging on corruption and disseminating that info to sleepers.
I'm saying it goes further than that. Trump himself is believed to have been an asset of law enforcement for decades. A CIVILIAN asset.
I believe many Trump allies are using this strategy. Get in, get what's needed, get out & continue civilian investigations.
In closing, perhaps I’ll let an old, dusty piece of parchment speak for me:
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.”
Perhaps, my fellow Anons, the levers of power in the U.S. Government are not so much under siege by [them,] but rather by us—more specifically, by those of us who have been on the inside of the beast, and have learned its ways, but who will never bear its mark.
Then again … I am just a humble tiger.
Until next time, stay Positive, stay Based and most importantly … stay Bright.
Want to submit a one-time donation? You can do so by buying me a coffee!
Paid supporters allow me to devote the time and research necessary to make this publication unique. All members of the growing Bright Army are appreciated.
Be sure to leave a comment below to let me know your thoughts on this piece and to provide your own. I read every one!
What comes to my mind in reading this is an old management concept called the 'matrix organization.' In such a firm there are two more-or-less orthogonal 'chains of command,' one of which is functional chain (accounting, for example) and one a business or project chain (automotive business). While this concept is largely discredited, because of the tensions and conflicts resulting from multiple managers with different and not necessarily aligned goals, such tensions and conflicts could be a most useful feature of an organization such as you describe here.
An organization like this is not necessarily limited to two dimensions. Conceivably, it could have multiple dimensions operating in different thought planes. The intersection points between the dimensions (planes) are where the tension, and therefore the key activities, reside.
Such intersections need not be correlated in any meaningful way and indeed, complex organizational goals could be accomplished by people and groups in such an organization, where each has only a passing (it that) familiarity with what others are doing.
Such an organization would appear from the outside exactly as you describe: chaotic and unfocused.
But it would be capable of operating in such a way that no one group understood the overall goals and objectives, which likely would be too complex to be managed at that level in any case. Sort of like the blind men trying to describe an elephant by the sense of touch: one, feeling the elephant's trunk, thinks it is a snake; another, feeling a leg, thinks it is a tree.
A multi-dimensional chess player like Trump would be one of the few to grasp the overall strategy. To everyone else, it looks like random, inconsequential and mostly wasted energy. But such an organization could accomplish things so that the risk of outside penetration is greatly reduced. With no one person or group cognizant of the overall objective, how do you infiltrate it? Moreover, do you even know it is there, to try to infiltrate it?
Such an organizational structure could be extremely useful for a shadow, clandestine group operating 'hidden in plain sight.' Nothing is what it seems and nobody can see the entirety of what is going on, except for a small group of masterminds behind the scenes.
Wow ...,this is an expert analysis of the current and ongoing situation. This made me smile as I was reading it and helped me understand a little more clearly what I long suspected is really going on. Amazing work. Thank you!!